But thats not the point of Classic wow. which was expressly to enjoy an older style of MMOs with less QOL and more RPG.
It doesnt matter at all that wow in 2004-2008 was meant to be more casual than everquest or FFXI
what matter is that classic wow in 2019 was meant to be less casual with less QOL than retail ESO or FFXIV.
And classic WoW had it’s time, Classic was vanilla wow with minimal changes, less QOL and more RPG, let wotlk be wotlk in all it’s glory. The expansion touted probably one of the best in WoWs history doesn’t need rewriting, it was perfect because of what it was.
Megaservers good
Boosting good
Cross realm Wintergrasp and BGs good
Same faction BGs good
99% one faction “pvp” servers good
Marked OP as trolling and moving on.
[quote=“Nyseine-whitemane, post:162, topic:1290719”]
an older style of MMOs [/quote]
Even retail is old style by today’s standard.
with less QOL
Definitively
and more RPG.
You can’t force this through ingame measures. Blizzard probably knows this as well but is willing to pretend they dont. I too wish the community would be there to engage with, but RDF doesnt add or take away from that. Those who want a friend group to adventure with out in the world and build connections will do so, even with the tool in game, and those who dont wont, no matter how many hurdles you put in front of them.
Thats an opinion of yours, one that Blizzard passed on #somechanges.
it’s an opinion of the majority of people who have been waiting for wotlk since classic was announced. but sure, minimise it.
Imagine thinking the features of the game don’t dictate how its consumed or its user experience. You sound silly rn.
imagine alluding to the fact that rdf doesn’t let players be in the world doing things while waiting for queue
instead of stuck in a city reading chat spam or watching an addon
Thats an assertion with no real evidence, that you can “believe” but is not empirical.
Imagine thinking a straw man is worth the 30 seconds you spent typing that.
statistical averages based off social and forum users wanting rdf begs to differ.
even it’s not completely empyrical polling isnt either and has some degree of accuracy based of a sample size.
Oh no there definitly is a way to get empirical data on the subject. only blizzard would be able to do that. I’m not argueing wether your wrong or right, but acting like you know what a :
Is factually incorrect.
no there isnt, there is 0 way blizzard can force all potential wotlk players to answer if they want rdf or not.
how disingenuous.
about as factually incorrect as you denying it.
Ultimately you chooose to believe that a majority of the people “waiting for wotlk since classic was announced.” share the same opinion as you based on very limited scrutable evidence, because you want to. Its a silly thing to do and to tote it around as fact, i’ll rub your nose in every time.
again… polling. also you replied to yourself.
you’re not rubbing anything into my face, because nothing you say holds weight.
Imagine READING COMPREHENSION
imaging not understanding how polling and sample sizes work.
projection
i don’t think you understand what projection is.