Dungeon finder, out of touch with the community

Does “end up” mean something different to you?

1 Like

You realize TBC Classic and SoM and Classic legacy are all still available, right? Play that if you don’t want LFD.

7 Likes

I am looking forward to playing LK the way they announced it. You are the one unhappy, that is why you came here, remember?

You clicked some buttons and everything.

2 Likes

Except for the fact that these are two totally different games at this point…From graphics to systems in place these are two totally different games at this point.

3 Likes

Turn your graphics down, go to Northrend, sit in Dalaran, and queue for the dungeons and raids in retail. You’ll have the same experience there you seem to be looking for here. You won’t meet many people, but it will really work well for your schedule.

1 Like

Well, either way as you can see based on this post alone and countless others on multiple different websites, many people disagree with you and don’t have the same experience as you in TBCC, the majority have had extremely negative encounters with it to the point of not wanting to bother with alts or doing dungeons. It was in original wrath and successful during wrath, what happened afterwards with further and different tools is irrelevant. We want it, and we shall get it.

6 Likes

You’re right, and if we stay quiet nothing will change. Hence the reason for this forum… Holly Longdale stated that “This is what the community wants,” yet I don’t recall being sent a survey on that and from what I’ve been seeing between the forums, threads on Facebook, WoWhead, and LFG chat it doesn’t seem like that’s really the case. At the very least we boil up the pot until a public survey is conducted to see what the people really want.

9 Likes

Yeah as though the playstyle hasn’t changed at all…

2 Likes

You see the people complaining that don’t like the path that Blizzard is on. If LFD were introduced you would not be here, but that does not mean that you wouldn’t exist. I do see Blizz caving on this, it is what they do. I was surprised they actually made an attempt to save classic from wow players who have never really known what is best for them in the long run.

It is LFD. You just AOE anyway.

We will be getting it, see you in wrath friend.

4 Likes

what do you think the game is now? you either look in lfg for randoms or play with friends

1 Like

I agree that you will, but I hope it turns out better this time as the expansions progress. Either way, Northrend will at least be fun.

I’m enjoying people shifting blame to LFR as the “bad” cross realm based queue system.

you can’t “shift” that which was already in place, LFR has long been blamed. rightfully so.

4 Likes

Keeping a server limited LFD would be an interesting alternate history. Queue times would have remained a little longer, but attitudes of people in groups and the impact on server community would have been positives well worth it.

3 Likes

And LFD.

These forums were crucifying anything related to cross realm and queues not that long ago, and was one of the major things people hated about retail and wanted to get away from in classic.

And it’s come full circle.

To me it just shows Blizzard was right the whole time.

If Cata classic ever comes out, LFR will be absolutely cried to keep in the game just like LFD is in Wrath.

that’s right. cmon, LFD lovers. dont you wanna be a fox :expressionless:

I can guarantee you that you wont see anything similar to same the level of magnitude for LFR as we are seeing for Dungeon finder. I don’t browse these forums regularly but in general i have never seen a majority or severe level of outrage against Dungeon finder.

Dungeon finder was successful during it’s implementation of Wrath, LFR was not successful during its implementation in Cata – It really is a no brainer where to draw the line and for it not go full circle.

7 Likes

Depends on what you call a success. Training the population to rely on queue based gameplay enough that it led to LFR within the period of one expansion is not a success to me.