No not true That would only be fact if there was not Is a cost associated with it but there is.
You have to go to the City And pay 50 gold a Respect That is restrictive like it or not Is Dual speck would mean getting rid of that restriction.
This opens up Is choice you now Have that freedom where you can have access to your off spec.
Whenever you want That is reasonable Is player freedom.
Saves the tedium of resetting bars and talent points.
It gives them a lot more than that it gives them the freedom to try something new.
It lets them have access to PVP easier It lets them be a little bit more toolboxy have a farming speck if youâre a tank or healer.
And no it does not give you the power to go from I canât kill this to oh I can solo everything.
Is nor does it give you the power boost wb do It just more player freedom Is any more player choice thatâs OK.
So they canât respec now to try something new?
This statement isnât even true.
Iâve already explained this to you I detail so I have little faith youâll retain it this time around but Iâll try again one more time.
More âfreedomâ does not automatically = better for the game.
More freedom can mean an infinite number of possibilities that are based completely on your subjective desires for what makes the game more âfreeâ for you, for one thing.
More talent points would give you more build freedom, or more freedom to use spells you canât normally use. Does that mean itâs a good idea?
Making everything in the game cost dramatically less gold or maybe even zero gold would give players more âfreedomâ too, does that mean itâs a good idea?
The whole point of most video games is evaluating how you overcome obstacles that the game itself puts Infront of you. Intentional limitations on your freedom that you must circumvent with your gameplay.
The freedom you desire is essentially to skip the actual game, because you are not blocked from having a 2nd spec, you just donât want to put in the gameplay needed to access it. Youâre lazy.
Such freedom does not make the game better. It only makes it better for you because you want the game to be a certain way that it factually and historically never was. Itâs selfishness. Hubris. And a number of other words.
Get over yourself. Youâre not getting dual spec.
That is based on the assumption that most people are already respeccing often and with dual spec theyâll save the gold theyâre already spending.Itâs more likely the most people arenât spending the gold to respec and with a 1,000 gold cost will spend more with dual spec. If itâs added my respec cost will go from zero to 1k gold.
Just keep swimmingâŚjust keep swimmingâŚ
He doesnât even know what he wants. If Blizzard did Dual Spec, I can guarantee nobody would cite it as a reason for quitting.
Given the retail additions including other changes like HvH and Druid energy, drawing the line at Dual Spec is like cutting off your nose despite your face.
The phrase âperfectly enjoyableâ is very obviously to someone who isnât a trolling mess of a person, not identical in meaning to saying something is perfect.
So there wouldnât be a cost associated with your supposed implementation of dual spec?
In your current argument if dual spec had a cost it also wouldnât offer any added âfreedomâ either?
Your just talking in circles
They shouldnât.
Thatâs not how the game was designed or intended to be played and since we are playing a recreation of that design, itâs only natural that the same logical limitations would be present.
Saying that people arenât respeccing due to the cost is basically identical to just saying âPeople arenât doing what Blizzard hoped/intended them not to doâ. So whereâs the problem?
Hey Blizzard made the game, I just play here. Not my fault I like the game the way Blizzard made it 
Sidebar: You are like the absolute worst at pointing out contradicting statements or viewpoints, to the point of pretty much never succeeding to actually make an effective point, like no joke, I think most would not contest the assertion that deconstructing an argument or pointing out flaws in one is absolutely not your forte lol. Iâd recommendâŚother methods of approaching discussion for your level of competence at it.
The problem is itâs a design flaw that needed correction. Since we already know what that correction is it should be added early. Just like the hunter dead zone was a design flaw that blizzard realized and fixed and just like the drums was a problem that was fixed in a later expansion. Just like many other problems that were fixed in later expansion but added earlier in classic BC
If you truly liked the game the way blizzard made it youâd have quit when they banned multiboxer software and hardware. Youâd have quit when they added the boost and the paid mount and the drum nerf and ect.
I just let you do all the work. Readers will draw their own conclusions. I mean, all I did was quote you. I didnât even say there was a contradiction. You did. Which probably means you pointed it out without much help from me.
Way to go!
If you think the vast majority of readers who actually take the time to digest your attempts to contrive people to death actually come out of the experience agreeing with you, you not only have a generous idea of how much nonsense people are willing to tolerate, butâŚitâs almost cute the kind of fantasy world you live in.
I think they must be the type who sees people realizing they are not worth interacting with anymore as a sign of victory.
Itâs not a design flaw.
Itâs how tbc was designed and it was intended. We have a blue post proving this that has been given in the big dual spec thread.
Wotlk saw a design goal shift that had it changed. And the feature you are asking for was part of wotlk design.
The lack of dual spec in tbcc is not a design flaw, itâs working as intended.
âif I donât like something, itâs a design flawâ