Like I said a hybrid issue.
1 Like
The game of WoW does not rise and fall, grow or shrink, succeed or fail on your personal needs or desires.
I don’t think you really know anything.
Unless you have the devs on speed dial and they told you personally how they felt, of course.
5 Likes
It’s a trend among the those who hold mutually exclusive ideals. Think of it like all those people who said they’d leave the country once Orange Man was elected. How many of them actually did that?
Corpseknife is harmless, Feywaif. If Dual Spec gets put into the game, he won’t protest it and will take it under the chin like all the rest.
None of these people will stand on principle. At the end of the day, they’re just here to score victory points for being on the opposing side of something–even if that means being constantly contradictory.
1 Like
Absolutely correct.
I mean, you guys make it so easy.
Kumasama, what are your thoughts on retail-spec?
If you are for changes, why are you trying to limit people to only 2 specs?
3 Likes
Getting blizzard to do anything is difficult. Better to ask for a minor change like dual spec than a large change. Why do you keep suggesting we ask for major changes when all we want is a small change?
So dual spec is minor but tri spec isn’t?
One gives two spec options, the other gives 3. Why is 2 minor but 3 isn’t?
2 Likes
So do explain to me how Warriors, Rogues, Priests, and And warlocks are hybrids?
This one how am I only carrying about myself It’s not like I’m the only one Is that once duel speck too how am I short sighted?
And yes you are correct the road to hell is indeed paved with good intentions however sometimes good intentions are just that.
For exam Shooting somebody because you see them trying to stab somebody is somebody would be a questional morally decision.
I’m asking for a feature in the game that would overall help people because you know we can’t I think at this point need to look and see.
The game is bleeding people Is whether it be hypop or low pop I see it all the time people saying yeah we’re having trouble get even a consistent roster at this point.
One person gets sicker they can’t play they all the sudden half the maybe even canceled the raid because I can’t find a replacement.
Right now it’s no longer an issue of gay people to try new things isn’t issue that people need to be able to fill Is multiple certain rolls consistently and asking people to pay a 100 gold for every single time is ridiculous.
No I’m not saying all the time however The game is dying slowly in case you haven’t noticed so do tell how backward is me saying duel spack Would be good for the game When the writings on the walls.
Obviously I’m not and it’s not just simply my desire there are other people that want it in the game too.
I mean were at 5513 And going Just saying maybe it’s not just me that wants it in the game.
Is again we’ve seen the good this feature can do And especially right now because it’s something that is getting worse.
People are leaving the game and a good reason for that is instead of people going to try something different the barrier to entry is so high unless you really have to you’re not going to do it.
Nobody goes oh yeah I’m totally just going to farm gold to Respect And if there are it’s a very very very very small amount.
Dull spack Gives people freedom and choice there is nothing wrong with that And forgive me If I care about something Again I say that’s why I’m on here because I care.
about the game And yes I have considered the good and potential bad and here’s the truth the potential bad is menacis is miniscule in comparison to the potential good it will do we have seen proof of it.
Sounds good!!
2 Likes
This would be a big help!
2 Likes
2 post history
1 post history
I wonder who’s alts these are…
Ironic. /10 char
Aside from the fact this is obviously a gigantic cop out that anyone can spot a mile away, why do you think retail spec is a “large change”, but dual spec isn’t?
Classic was built on Legion client which is when retail spec was added. Dual spec no longer exists in the modern game. If anything the argument is there that it would be “easier”.
However, this “baby steps” argument is kind of funny coming from you, given what your arguments for dual spec have been. You’ve essentially grounded yourself on the logic that nobody is effected and it has no impact on the game other than giving people more options and freedom, and this naturally applies to tri-pec just as much (more) as it does to dual spec does.
So you’re finding something inherently problematic with tri-spec as a feature to be added, and you’re settling for dual spec. One has to wonder why it is you think dual spec is a completely insignificant change, while tri-spec is a “major” change.
But the idea that Blizzard some kind of child you can only coax in to tiny adjustments like a dog is silly.
If TBC already had dual spec, simply by default, would you then be here arguing for tri-spec since that would be a tiny no-impact change adjustment from dual spec?
3 Likes
Because he is a dishonest liar.
You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of basic game design tenets.
A game is essentially, at it’s core, a set of limitations. You, as the player, must rise to surmounting those limitations to achieve a goal.
That’s literally what a game is.
This idea that “freedom” is great no matter where it’s given is fictional.
Why as a mage are unable to access Warlock spells?
Limitation.
Why is running speed capped? Why not let us go speedhack levels of movement?
Limitation.
Why only 51 talent points?
Limitation.
Why one raid lockout per week?
Limitation.
Why dailies only once a day?
Limitation.
Why not 10 pieces of loot instead of 2-3 per boss?
Limitation.
Why can’t I PvP kill my own faction?
Limitation.
The thing you fundamentally don’t seem to understand is that “freedom” is not synonymous with “good game design”.
The lack of dual spec is an intentional limitation. It wasn’t an accident or a bug. They wanted it like that on purpose.
Is giving people 71 talent points instead of 51 talent points “more freedom”? Yes. Does that mean it’s a good idea?
No.
Please interpret this information before responding again with some variation of “what is wrong with players having more freedom qq” (which is an intentionally misleading argument catered to emotions, essentially).
2 Likes
At this point, being called a liar by a select few of the people in here is essentially a badge of honor, I almost want to start a club.
#dishonestliars
It’s a symbol of your surrender to logic, with nothing to bring to the table, while trying to save face. This hash-tag will henceforth be a title to be proud of.
Highly hypocritical. Most of your entire post history on this subject can be gleaned to be intentional disruptive, dishonest, and outright false in a lot of cases for the purposes of misusing peoples words and intentions.
Your “strategy” in this discussion is also highly familiar to that of dishonest liars on real life subjects.
For example, you will cherry pick specific phrases or lines from posts, and then spin that in to it’s own inflammatory distraction even when it betrays the intended meaning of the entire post. When you get called out on it, your excuse is that it’s impossible for you to mis-quote or mis-represent an argument because people can simply look at the whole quote and get the contexts themselves.
What you don’t seem to realize, oddly, is that this doesn’t alter the reality that what you’re doing is toxic.
This is rather like some main stream media, let’s take CNN for example since I bet it’s like 99% chance that seeing a CNN broadcast would tighten your undies, cherry-picking a quote or taking a tiny fragment of a speech or exert in order to write a whole hit-piece on someone. Is it excusable because the “real information” simply exists out there for a person to go research for themselves?
Since you seem to really like Trump (or are at least indifferent/accepting of him), let’s use the far right as an example. Mouthpieces of the far right are often guilty of spreading misinformation, whether it be vaccines, the true long-term effects of certain presidential decisions, the implications of more freedoms for LGBTQ+ (such as bathroom access), women’s reproductive freedom, and more.
Often what the far right will do is take somewhat grains of truth, and spin those in to entire narratives that drive large numbers of people (followers) to interpret that information to an extreme, which radicalizes them to be fervently against something that…in reality, isn’t a big deal. It’s why all far righters believe Obama wanted to “take their guns”, or that Biden is somehow dying on the podium simply because he has a (well documented) speech impediment, or that vaccines cause any number of more threatening conditions than actually getting COVID, or that vaccines are killing large amounts of people. Except none of that is true.
When pushed on these matters, most of the people who are guilty of spreading this misinformation will often say “Look at the data” or “do your own research”, and try to turn your eyes towards the information that they catalyzed to concoct that misinformation as a scapegoat, but it doesn’t change the fact: they knew what they were doing.
Now bringing this back down in to the scope of the topic and your posting style…
This is what you do. You think that because the whole post is there, it somehow absolves you of intentionally warping the information you’re responding to in order to formulate a false narrative that the original poster didn’t intend or is clearly not intending in context.
You think that if what you’re doing is not explicitly ban-able by the Blizzard TOS team, that you are acting perfectly within normal expectations of a person in polite conversation, which is a form of “leaning on the rules” to defend your bad faith approach.
In summary: you are a very bad actor, and anyone with common sense can see that, to the point of it being almost gross, and being called a #dishonestliar by the biggest liar in the room? This is basically the highest form of a compliment.
4 Likes
It becomes a hybrid issue in later expansions. At the moment, however, a Rogue could use it to switch between pure Combat DPS and EA Combat depending on whether or not your raid needs the utility. Same as how Warriors could switch between Kebab Spec and Pure Fury Spec if they wanted to put a Blood Frenzy on the table.
Warriors can tank or DPS.
Priests can DPS or heal.
As far as I’m aware that makes them hybrids. It’s not like I (feral druid) can heal a dungeon any better than a shadow priest could.
Locks and rogues aren’t, sure, but you get a 50%.