I’m not talking about talent changes.
I’m talking about 3 talent specs. Swapping specializations.
This is too much fun. You guys are tripping all over yourselves and it’s hilarious.
1 Like
If it would be as easy to add trispec as it seems it would be to add dual spec I’d be fine with it being added. If it would take the same amount of dev time and company resources I’d have no problem with tri-spec. But I don’t trust you have a single clue what you’re talking about.
https://twitter.com/Marlamin/status/1118639481844793344
This was figured out before release of vanilla classic.
Ah so we have another #allchanges fella here 
As long as it’s easy to implement and nobody (or, the majority) has a problem, it’s totally fine right?
So tell me Fey, how would LFD and LFR affect your experience? Why can’t those be added? How are those game-wide impacting?
1 Like
I’d be happy with the addition of the LFD but unlike dual spec that has only about 6 people against it it seems the LFD was more controversial. I never used the LFD it didn’t affect me at all. I’m not going to spend time fighting for or against something I don’t care about. Just like drums and the seal change. I didn’t need the change but I didn’t fight against it because I didn’t care.
So you are #allchanges.
That means you are a very poor candidate for discussion on what should or shouldn’t be added to the game, since you have no line, and therefore cannot be a reliable foundation for how to build the product as advertised.
FYI, the devs said #somechanges, not #allchanges.
2 Likes
It must be difficult for you to engage in normal every day activities when your reading comprehension is so low. You have my pity.
There is not a single change you would be against unless it affected you negatively somehow.
You are #allchanges.
You don’t have to be ashamed of it, just own it.
As long as you recognize the devs don’t agree with your perspective. They do have a line, and have stated definitively that changes to TBCC are surgical and conditional.
How can you be expected to have rational input when you would accept any change to an expansion that is targeting a specific experience (an event that occurred already years ago and came to completion) with specific limitations in mind?
1 Like
Is your reading comprehension that low or are you lying because you want to “win” the debate? One can never be 100% sure with you.
IDK, is the only thing you know how to do is insult reading comprehension and preach #allchanges? Because I’ve yet to see an argument for dual spec from you that isn’t #allchanges.
2 Likes
Since I have never supported all changes the only explanation for your accusation is low reading comprehension. Or lying. It may seem insulting for me to point out the truth about your error but it’s a fact you really should face and start to work on.
Since 1 or 2 people, not me, claimed all your arguments boil down to no changes you’ve decided to claim every one you argue with is for all changes. It’s a rather sad and pathetic way to debate.
No…you are lying.
If there isn’t a change you would be against outside of creating a personal disadvantage, you are #allchanges.
Blizzard isn’t typically in the business of changing something purely to be a pain in the butt, so obviously, all changes are made in the interest of improving the experience.
Therefore, there really isn’t any change that Blizzard would feasibly make that you would be against.
Everyone is sick of your annoying attitude though. All you do is call everyone liars or insult their reading comprehension, like as if you have any sort of superior leg to stand on.
3 Likes
Now you speak for everyone. Is it narcissism, ignorance, or hubris? Since I’ve received 1.4 k likes for Feywaif-Bloodsail-Buccaneers posts you’re clearly wrong about that.
Yeah…you go girl 
1 Like
I have received 2.6k likes, does that mean my opinion>your opinion?
3 Likes
It means that if I had said
that I’d be wrong. Of course since I’m not a complete and total moron I’ve never tried to speak for everyone.
Yeah I’ve got 1.7k as well, so I’m a little confused by his reasoning.
1 Like
OK 1st off Yes there is And this is also based on the person’s experience I can only say what happened when it was released and wrath on my server.
There were an increase in tanks and healers Myself being one of them As far as the argument wider tanks and heroes get instant queues now?.
That’s not dual spack That’s the way the game has been changed As far as classes have been changed Is compare what you have to worry about as far as a tank in tbc.
And what you have to deal with and even in wrath Is in comparison to now is like trying to compare oh I don’t know Is an Orange to German chocolate cake.
It’s a million times harder to do it now on top of that people expect you to already know what you’re doing oh yeah sure that’s the case now in tbcc But let’s be honest here in shadow hands it’s a million times worse.
Is the drop off really started to happen in cataclysm I wonder why Hey the introduction of add on a warcraft this was also the point Where your class being fun to play was less important and is it challenging to play become more important.
So that answers your Is retail question aside from Is it adds more flexibility here character no that is an argument That’s not just because I want it it’s because a lot of other people want it I’ve talked to several people on my server.
I’ve heard this discussed through several podcasts you tubers If I’m the only person that wants for my own personal desire how do you explain that.
I want it because a lot of others do And it gives people choice it would give them the is them the ability to have a main speck in offspect there’s nothing wrong with that.
Especially for tanks and healers having forbid they have A DPS spec where they can farm easier or pvp.
And yes although it does overall benefit tanks and healers more that doesn’t mean it doesn’t benefit others as well Is anyone that wants to PVP is a huge one.
Like it or not If you’re going to even remotely take it seriously even remotely you need to be spec for it.
It’s just that simple
The reasoning is if people are liking someones posts than clearly the claim that
is incorrect. I think the logic is impeccable there. Now this is an opinion. Those with a maturity level over the age of 10 admit when they make a mistake. Therefore in my opinion you’re less mature than a 10 year old. I’m also of the opinion that people who think they can speak for everyone are narcissistic and ignorant.
That you were wrong is a fact. That you’re an ignorant narcissist with a maturity level less than the average 10 yeah old is just my opinion.
You are being objectively rude and aggressive without it being at all warranted.
You’re just a weird person who thinks the only way to get their point across is attacking people’s intellect or personality.
You’re like a walking ad-hominem machine.
I don’t see how anyone wouldn’t get that impression if they were honestly reading your posts.
3 Likes
Not being able to understand that people think differently from the way you think is the crux of our debate. You can’t understand how anyone couldn’t have fun in the same way you do so you want to force them to play in exactly the same way you do. You can’t comprehend how something could be very unfun for some people when it’s just a minor inconvenience to you. Your tiny little brain can’t understand how many people could like my posts when you hate them. The word for that is a total lack of empathy, the lack of any capacity to understand or feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference