You give them way too much credit. They have lazy entitlement and a lot of justifications for feeling that way and being fine with it - thats it. Cant realistically call that an argument.
You can make a case for wanting dual specs so long as its honest about its lazy and entitled nature - you cant make a case for needing them cuz TBC doesnt need dual specs.
Yes, you did.
In fact, you just gave me an argument in FAVOR of dual spec.
Now, tell me why Recruit a Friend and buyable cards…
I’ll wait, go ahead.
you could have 1,000,000 arguments for having dual spec in TBC classic
you’re still not getting it
get over it
Make sure you keep saying that. It really make us change our minds and totally doesn’t bump the thread.
The RaF feature was extremely abusable you could get all your characters to 70 MUCH faster, flooding the market with profession alts, teleport around the world to your friend location (node camping would be even worse with bots), exc.
The boost is basically a toned down RaF that gives blizzard more profit.
As for the mount, it’s a digital version if what the physical card shop did back in the day.
And do tell what argument did I give that is for dual spec?
Cool! Not sure why you brought it up or what it has to do with anything, but pretty cool!
I didn’t. You brought it up to counter my saying that TBC added a level 58 boost to the game as something that nobody “needs” and doesn’t solve any problems but was still added to the game regardless.
Hence, you moved the goalposts.
you brought it up first, doofus
you dual spec trolls are insufferable.
Brought what up first?
When did I say anything about that?
Dave Greco (Freelance artist, has done work for Blizz) made a tweet asking for Dual Spec in the new Classic Mastery servers. Orlando Salvatore (Classic Senior Software Engineer) liked that tweet.
Delimicus is absolutely correct when he says anyone who posts on an throwaway alt just shouldn’t be trusted.
You have zero investment in the game. Even by the offchance you actually do have a level 70 alt who is hiding behind your alt, the fact of the matter is you choose a throwaway alt to be your “face” to ensure you can say whatever you please without any backlash to your main.
You have zero confidence in anything you say.
You have no stake in the game. No investment.
You argue for the sake of argument and then pull non-sequiturs, red herrings, and just using that character to artificially prop up other posters by throwing a 
on occaision in semblance of actual support.
trust the plan
two more weeks
Q
If put into the game, whoa-boy!
Will have a field day having to restrain myself from “I told you so’s” to everyone here who denied it would happen.
I mean they can put it in classic mastery…that’s not what this thread is about lol, there’s tons of interesting changes on classic mastery that look interesting.
Completely irrelevant to it’s inclusion to TBCC.
Huh? Why wouldn’t they add it to TBC Classic?
It has a different goal from Classic Mastery. This…should be obvious.
What was that goal?
LMGTFY.
That’s strange, I don’t remember Alliance Paladins having Seal of the Martyr during the original release of World of Warcraft®: The Burning Crusade®.
Help me out here, how is this game a faithful recreation if they did stuff like that?
Doesn’t effect the faithfulness of the experience, so most of us let stuff like that slide.