Wake me up when you stop trying to launch attacks on people with words that you don’t understand. My position was simple before you chose to use the word “contradiction” without understanding it.
If you’re going to attack someone’s credibility as the basis of you’re argument then know what the heck you’re talking about. If not then don’t launch attacks.
Stick to making your argument in terms you understand. Give up on credibility attacks, you’re not good at them.
Recruit a friend would give you a lot more than 1 lvl 58.
The boost is far less damaging than what RaF was capable of.
I have a druid alt. I like to heal but questing and farming with a resto spec isn’t fun for me. So I’ve specced her for dps. There is a healer shortage on my server as well as a tank shortage. If there was dual spec I would heal with my druid. There are others like me who would tank or heal if there was dual spec. I am one actual in game example of where dual spec would give the benefits I claim it will.
You can claim there aren’t enough of us to make a difference and dismiss my argument but you don’t know that. You can just tell me to farm more to pay the respec costs but I won’t do that either. I have the right to choose how I play the game and I choose to spec dps because there is no dual spec. How ever small the number I and others like me are an example of an in game benefit to all the people on my server with the addition of dual spec.
Yeah that is true Extremely true on top of that we’ve seen other situations where dual spec doesn’t affect the game in a negative way.
Another day, another reminder from me that the whiners did not get what they asked for and will not get what they asked for.
Apart from the fact that this is pure conjecture, shouldn’t this then also apply to the people who don’t want a change, means those people who want the game to stay the same as it is?
According to your argumentation, most players don’t care, and of those who do the absolute majority is in favor for dual spec, right?
And since most don’t care and will get more options than less with dual spec, most are likely to opt for the more options. This is also speculative, but if you’re objective, I think you’ll agree here.
Yet horde whiners got HvH battlegrounds.
If horde whines for dual spec blizzard will make it happen.
Horde only asks for reasonable things. Dual spec was never reasonable. It wasn’t even in game for the duration of one expansion. It’s not a feature worth asking for.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Exactly!
Good job dwelling on the meaningless things, and ignoring anything of meaning.
I commend you.
I really needed a good laugh. That is one of the funniest things I’ve ever read on the forums.
Cool!
If you would like to talk about anything objective, especially the merits of Dual Spec, then feel free to add something worth discussing.
And it just keeps getting funnier. 
If you say so 
You say you’re OK with arena’s back but what’s the matter with dual speck and achieves exactly what arena speck would do and also give you a farming speck to go farm.
So doesn’t Duel spack Is accomplished exactly what you’re suggesting The only difference is players have the freedom to control what they do with it.
So what’s the difference I mean what you’re saying is that you want people to have a specific PDP spec but you’re not OK with them having the the freedom to use it for farming.
Why not just give them dual speck I mean isn’t that the same thing If people are going to have Is a second speck most of the time that’s what people are going to be using it for if not that it’s gonna be using For farming.
I mean See what the big difference would be
Is agreed And again I keep saying this over and over again The way people play now is very different if you’re going to PVP you want to be expect for pvp Advice versa
It’s why because they know it plays a bigger role in classic you could get away with PVP and APV East back because it had less of an impact.
Not so much in tbc You go in PDP as APDE spec you’re going to get crushed.
Is just plain and simple
So how’s that a classic fresh coming along with all those potential changes what it blizzards say oh wait they want feedback
So you want to know what I think they should do I think they should change the loot system so they give us tear tokens instead of having the items drop.
And I think Dulce back would be a very good change as well And you know what sentence it’s going to be seasonal.
I think they should give us wrath Is talent trees But let us gain talent points at level one instead of level 9.
So we have 60 talent points instead of 51 That would definitely change of the medic quite a bit.
Huh?
It’s OK, you don’t understand the difference between nochanges and being OK with changes as long as they respect the design intent and goals of tbc.
I am not nochanges.
The design intent of RaF was to get people to join their friends in tbc content faster. Which was the reason given for boosts being added (and obviously they added it for $$$ as well) while also leaving out the RaF feature which was far more abusable for the player base.
The store mount was also already a thing with the physical cards that blizzard sold back during tbc, this is just a digital version of that.
I didn’t move the goal posts, it was always that changes should be in line with the design intent of tbc for any changes made to tbcc. It’s your side of the argument that is constantly and intentionally misrepresenting where the goal posts stand that is causing the confusion for people as to where the goalposts stand.
at this point I hope they do in fact ruin TBC Classic by adding dual spec so all you clowns can stay here while we have fun in Season of Mastery.
PLEASE stay away from Season of Mastery if you are pro dual spec. you are not welcome.