I called out people for brazen lies. Stuff like removing “don’t” and other reconstitutions of claims I made in my sentences in a quote to claim I am saying the opposite of what I was saying. If you want to accept complete lies as valid debate go for it.
At any rate you’re own bias is clear as day.
I don’t even fully oppose change or dual spec - you think I do because you believe the lies. Lies peddled by a specific four people. Not everyone on the pro dual spec spectrum - just a few on the campaign trail. At any rate the intellectual dishonesty and blatant lying is why I essentially quit the topic now for the most part.
If you spent a little time reading the context of my replies that you quoted (arrow up if you like) you will see that I caught the poster, Kanshu, out in a complete lie. He quoted me twice from the same comment and removed half of it in the second quote to make it look like two different but contradictory comments. That’s not even a mistake, that’s intentional and deliberate overt deception.
There’s four specific people who basically engage in full character assassination if anyone triggers actual discussion that threatens their little campaign. Any attempts at compromise or give and take discussion they derail in this manner. I don’t apologise for calling them out.
In fact you are also misquoting me so badly here I reckon you’re probably Kanshu’s alt or you know him. There’s no way you can read what he did and try to defend it. Does it trigger me when people deliberately fabricate words and reconstruct sentences and claim they’re mine in order to discredit me - yeah it does. It would anyone. That sort of tactic is disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself for defending it.
Hmmm yeah, I bet you do.