You’ve literally argued that it isn’t fine a’la “all you have is #nochanges”.
Basically implying that this isn’t a good enough argument. Not just simply that you disagree with it, but that it’s actually invalid.
See, this is the hilarious part, you can’t seem to see how you are the one missing the nuance.
I would consider myself a #nochanges person, in general.
However, changes have been made, so I am forced to determine which changes I am OK with, and which I am not. The only alternative is to immediately quit the game.
Changes being made doesn’t invalidate the mentality of a #nochanges perspective, it just forces the person who is #nochanges to either reconcile or don’t.
Luckily, I have mostly reconciled with the changes already made (as I’ve stated before, the boost is still almost unforgivable, given the harm it’s caused that we’ll be dealing with for the entirety of the expansion).
There’s no hypocrisy here. It’s simply -true- nuance.
You can’t be granted the same leniency.
You want a change without any idea (nor do you even care) about it’s overall effect on the product. You just selfishly want it to improve your own experience (or your friends, doesn’t matter). Given that you want a change like dual spec, you need to justify why tri-spec (or retail-spec) is not on the menu. You need to justify why LFD, LFR, or literally every single feature added up to modern retail WoW is not on the menu.
At some point you need to hit a wall, where something is not on the menu/possible to be added.
Once you reach that point, you ask yourself: “Why couldn’t dual spec be a/the feature that doesn’t/couldn’t get added?”, and then, maybe you might actually start to get it.
I won’t hold my breath.