Dude.
Dude.
https:// slayersclub. bethesda. net/en/article/48xD6yVj0VsulONXKAnr7n/doom-eternal-overclocked-at-1000-fps
Sorry bout the spaces I’m on my phone and don’t have the full editor and can’t remember how to codeblock.
In short:
DOOM Eternal at 1006 fps
6.6GHz overclock
Liquid nitrogen cooled
Fricking nuts. Lol
I don’t think there’s a computer screen that exists that can do 1000Hz.
but the human eye can only see 60fps…
…
…
…
…
…
…
.
That is so untrue. I can easily tell the difference between 60 FPS and 144 FPS.
“Sarcasm is “a sharp, bitter, or cutting expression or remark; a bitter gibe or taunt”. Sarcasm may employ ambivalence, although sarcasm is not necessarily ironic. Most noticeable in spoken word, sarcasm is mainly distinguished by the inflection with which it is spoken and is largely context-dependent.”
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Weren’t you just in here a few days ago criticizing me for “being mean”?
Sorry buddy. I agree, I personally need 85fps or better to not get a headache myself.
Not you, “You”.
oh, You.
/10char
Yeah, when the camera is moving I can definitely tell a difference. When it’s on a static image, not so much.
But still, just nuts.
I was just trying to point out that he was being sarcastic in a way I thought you would find amusing … apologies if I missed the mark. My son complains about my ‘mom jokes’ and I guess this was a bad one.
Sorry friend if I hurt your feelings.
Thats crazy. I just wish the game was better.
I have doom eternal it was a rare impulse buy because i was a huge fan of doom (2016) which imo is a much better game than eternal.
I havent even played it for a month and a half…got to try it again.
So, my son made me watch the DOOM Eternal gameplay video release by Nvidia - amazing detail (we watched on our 1440p monitors - any difference at 4k?) and performance!
Hey Sal - Question: At what point does 4k gaming become more mainstream/viable? I often see people referring to 1440p/144hz as the ‘sweet spot’ and that’s where we are in my house. Are we CPU or GPU bound? Is it a matter of monitors with a faster refresh rate or that are more afforable?
Not sure but I can’t do 4k. UI ends up being too small and you can only scale it so much before it looks awful.
I don’t play too many games, but I’m visually impaired and the UI being tiny is a big no from me.
It’s harder to maintain because people buy parts always looking ahead and since 4k is on the farther end of the performance metric when new games come out it’s the first thing to fall short as your parts get older.
So this is why a lot of people still play 1080p because it’s easier to run.
2080ti could power most new games at 4k when it came out, but it struggles even with rtx off in new stuff like msflightsim2020.
If you target 1080p or 1440p 144 with the same card it will power it at high refresh when the card is new, and at least still manage 60fps longer when it’s old.
4k/60 today turns into 4k/30 when it’s old, and that’s a miserable experience
sub 75fps makes my gaming feel jumpy. I couldn’t imagine trying to 4k at 60… let alone 30.
I was playing at 1080p/60hz until last November when we upgraded to 1440p/144hz. I could not go back.
What do you think it will take for 4k/100hz+ ?
depends on the game - esports easy, but most people don’t care about resolution or details in those games.
in wow my current gpu, 5700xt, can pull off 4k/100 without too much of a settings hit.
but something like Horizon Zero Dawn ain’t happenin
If I actually focus on my work I can probably finish up early. Now I want to test this myself. How accurate is it if I just set the resolution to 200%?