Let’s be real tho. You want to be right but your not so your upset about it and can’t just let it go.
2 Likes
They looked at how the fight actually went back in 2006 and went with that.
2 Likes
True. But what amount of damage every second? If the aura did 10DPS every second would that be the original vision? Would that make you happy?
The designer chose the mechanics but did not fine tune the numbers. The numbers were chosen by the playtesters. The DTPS was chosen for a tick every 2 seconds. Everything else is your headcanon.
i am right about it being intended to be 1 second damage ticks, not 2 second damage ticks, here is my factual basis for that statement i have presented to you for the second time
once again, its you’re. and i am right.
im just here to correct you, if you want to say they are going with the bugged fight from 2006 thats fine. and thats basically what youre saying, which im not here to disagree with you about.
the most likely answer would be 600, just as much as each tick would be for 2 second ticks. so 600 frost damage every second
I’m correct tho. Keep posting what the developer intention was, and I’ll keep posting what the actual game mechanics were.
Game mechanics for the entire time Naxx existed until WoTLK. The version your asking for was NEVER a thing.
1 Like
What evidence is there to corroborate your statement? What makes it most likely other than “If it’s not, all my arrogance in this thread will bite me in my behind?”
The most likely answer is that the DTPS would be the same as launched because Blizzard playtesters aren’t a bunch of literal idiots who launch a raid doing half the damage as intended.
you are correct that they will go with the fight from 2006 most likely.
blah blah blah blah blah
Yea finally you are correct. Good for you
I knew you could figure it out… continue with your venture of asking for things that never existed in WoW
1 Like
what evidence is there that there is a hidden mechanic inside the damage tick algorithm that equivocates “600” as being a divisible number that relies on the frequency of its occurence? sounds like a lot more assumption has to be done on your part.
why does everyone get buttmad when i bring up facts?
You aren’t bringing facts, but opinions as demonstrated in my previous post. People are getting mad at you because you try to frame your opinions as facts, falsely, and are very arrogant at it.
1 Like
continue being as vague as possible to protect yourself from being wrong
about what? what have i said that you can prove is an opinion?
There just facts. There not vauge at all.
Very straightforward they are.
600 damage is the only recorded amount of damage that the damage tick does, therefore that is a factual statment
600 Damage taken per second is the only recorded amount of
damage per second that the damage aura does, therefore 300 ticks are a factual statement.
We can both play the “everything I say is a fact” game.
if you assume that there is a hidden division mechanic within the algorithm. which there is no evidence for.
bro just stop getting these little nasty side comments added. just speak facts and be a man
I speak the facts. The facts are that you are an arrogant poster who keeps spouting opinions as fact and insults people who disagree because he runs out of proper arguments. Is that manly enough for you?
did you have anything substantial to bring forward?