you are a force multiplier, you SHOULD be losing in all 1v1s if the other person really knows what they are doing, except other wars, when added with a healer though you become infinitely stronger.
That is why I like warrior, they are the ultimate team player, you kind of blow solo but when you got a buddy you become stronger than the sum of your parts.
This point has always bothered me because doesnât every class become infinitely stronger with a healer? Canât a Warlock stay alive longer and do more damage with a healer? Or any class for that matter. Iâve watched Warlocks tank Warriors. If they all become stronger with a healer that doesnât make the Warrior a superior class in a group settingâŚit just means that the class is not as bad as it is solo. Saying Warriors require a healer makes it sound even worse because the other classes do not require a pocket healer to compete.
Because of how rage and mana work in opposition to each other. And how some classes can burst down a single large health pool but once range is gapped and cdâs used have a harder time with melee on them.
Not to mention purging/dispelling shields, slows, roots, cc in general, etc.
a healer ainât keepin a clothie alive whoâs getting pummeled by 3+ people a warrior being healed can easily take that, and get a ton of rage from it at the same time
No a warlock getting pumped by someone doesnt benefit as much. Pushback on casts, squishy with cloth. A warrior taking dmg will get infinite rage to press buttons if they have a healer, effectively making them a murder machine