sure little timmy we believe you now go run along and don’t play in the streets
(this part was satire too)
so all your posts are satire right?
1 Like
WAIT, is he claiming SATIRE? in a un-nuanced text based format? What a rube.
“i’m not wrong, it was just satire.”
1 Like
I mean that one is just undoubtedly true, but notice how it specifically doesn’t pin everything on LFD.
Keep trying though.
ya doubles down on blaming Wrath systems and clams satire…
see he can be funny.
Wording your comment this way DOES imply that LFD caused the loss in subscribers.
Judging from the graph YOU provided on the other forum post:
Q2 of 2009 saw the lowest subscription count in Lich King - Q2 is BEFORE LFD was added. Which means that LFD had nothing to do with that drop in subs. In fact, it could be said that it actually helped the game because subs held steady (and even increased) AFTER it was released until Cataclysm.
So, no, technically, Vanilla, TBC and Early Wrath were ALL closer to the drop than LFD.
please enlighten us what other terrible long-lasting systems did wrath add that destroyed social functions.
That may be your interpretation, but it was never said.
Right.
Possibly, but that’s only a correlation.
We’re talking about the drop in Cataclysm. Please, keep up.
You… you didn’t play Wrath?
Oh man I’m about to get another vacation, oh it’s like Christmas. PLEASE save those posts forever. If he had any credibility fake or otherwise its gone now, what a complete joke. Can’t even stay in the game in his own bad arguments
1 Like
yes but that was not the question was it, I liked wrath (how it was).
*I blame the downfall of retail on legion and the systems it added (and have posted that stance several times).
You’re a joke. My goodness. It’s almost annoying how dense you are.
1 Like
ya but it’s dance puppet, dance… 
and then you just sit back and get a little amusement. (ok after a bit it’s a bit sad like arguing with a 6 year old).
The data shows the downfall of retail being sometime after Wrath, I wonder why that is.
No need to resort to ad hominems because you mistakenly are ranting about a data point no one else is concerned with.
I said I blame (read much) but back to the question at hand (one you’re trying to side track). (and not that it matters I said, I blame it because it’s what made me quit retail).
Right, and I blame Wrath, because I follow the data.
All of the features in Wrath all contributed to the downfall of WoW.
Almost like the problems were things changed after wrath not because of things added during wrath.
1 Like
Oh you want my data (what I blame for my issues with retail)
ok
RSV - MSV
Scaling
Borrowed powers
War powers
Your turn… what’s your data.
*oh ya where is that post where I said I had unsubbed and made you think I resubbed… your bold big mouth rant into this.
*Or do you just want to post some more satire… 
That’s… not what data is. Data is facts. Data is stats. That’s quite the opposite actually – that’s your subjective opinion.
Possibly, or it could’ve been due to the things that were added in Wrath. It’s all a moot conversation really. Blizzard already looked at the data and sided with anti-LFD.
People like to act there isn’t a finite end to Wrath, saying this led to that and years later this happened. It doesn’t matter. Wrath runs its cycle and it’s over.
If Blizz wants to do Classic+ then, fine. But to not even give players an authentic Wrath is just wrong.
3 Likes
I posted something what I blamed for retail failing, let see your data what other systems in wrath lead to the socal downfall of WOW after Wrath… (should I hold my breath or you going to just deflect again).
so you going to enlighten us or not with this data.
Again, you are misusing the word data. It does not mean what you think it means.