Cyrce's Circlet

At 642 this ring is far, and I mean far worse than my 626 ring. It is a 1.5% or 16K DPS loss. It is a terrible item. At this point even at 658 it wouldn’t be better. Why release it with the worst possible gems and create a situation where no one will use it. The only legitimate use will be for low ILVL players to fool groups into thinking they are a little higher ILVL.

Good try I guess.

26 Likes

right now its lacking hard.
I think if you wear it in the new zone you can see hidden chests thou.

5 Likes

That is something but I intend on spending the least amount of time in the new zone as possible.

1 Like

trust the plan, chud.

4 Likes

It works better when you socket the special gems into it.

2 Likes

I did, the armory doesn’t work well. I am not even wearing it.

642 IL… Huh, gotta callup my group, we may be entering keys soon.

2 Likes

Except it doesn’t because every Sim and every test has proven that it is a DPS loss.

10 Likes

I figured this was going to be the case.

1 Like

yep. Right now its a huge dps loss to wear this thing. I have it gemed up and upgraded for this week and its trash.
if it cant beat this ring then its trash for me https://www.wowhead.com/item=212447/key-to-the-unseeming?bonus=7981:11143:5878:10299
with dubble sockets

3 Likes

Bliz gave us trash gems week 1 for some reason. Can’t really use it until next week at least, possibly later.

11 Likes

I gave it a test run. I wanted to see just how much worse it was, not just a sim. Went into a +6 key.

Didn’t look into the healing, didn’t care. The stat loss in itself is huge and very noticable. The proc… is mediocre. Not sure if it’s part of the time gate as well, but while it says it’s a 211k proc, normal hits didn’t go over 56k. Crits hit for 112k’ish.

Very underwhelming. Hopefully it gets better, but I’d rather a ring that gave me three gem slots to put stat gems into, then this atm.

8 Likes

There are gems for each type that just give stats, those are the ones everyone is waiting for.

1 Like

I like that idea. 3 gems, each with 2250 total of a stat or stats. That would make the ring worthwhile.

2 Likes

That’s what you’ll be getting once we have the right gems. Just a high ilvl stat budget ring. For now we got all these under tuned procs and healing…

1 Like

With the stat gems it equates to far less than any other ring. The only thing that could be good are the procs, and if those aren’t good, then the ring is just garbage.

1 Like

Aren’t the numbers on the gems just wrong because they’re showing the itemisation for ilvl 619 when the ring itself starts at 639 now?

It has the same flaw as the Forbidden reach ring, we give up 6,000 secondary stats for terrible proc based gems.

JUST LET US CHOOSE BIS STATS 3k / 3k for every class and spec, and have 3 bonus sockets.

It’s so insane to see this playing out the same way again.

Losing 6,000 secondary stats instantly bricks the whole patch. JUST GIVE THE CIRCLET 3,000 / 3,000 of our chosen stats, and leave everything else the same.

PROBLEM SOLVED IN 5 MINUTES UR WELCOME.

God it hurts to watch blizzard fumble this.

18 Likes

This is a ring at the same ilvl 619

Key of the Unseeming
4150 Haste
1132 Mastery
5282 Total

Baddy Ring
1408 Mastery

440 Hast
440 Mastery
440 Crit
440 Vers

1760 Mastery
4928 Total

3 Likes

Yeah it’s 93% of budget. But it also goes to 658 not 639.

1 Like