Classic TBC will completely eliminate class population imbalances

What am I ignoring exactly? Do you understand what classes generally make up a good pvp comp? Do you think it’s all shamans Druids and hunters??? Lol

If you think people are going to create comps to farm honor outside of BG premades, you are crazy. It’s not going to happen.

BG premades are tryhards and there will ALWAYS be class stacking in tryhards. Blizzard has never been able to fix that.

A year at most. TBC will be available imo, 6 months after Naxx, at least announced with a date.

What? When did I say anything about people making groups outside of bg premades? My dude are you actually schizo? You are seriously making up stuff out of nowhere.

Just like people do in pve. Which tbc fixes drastically. Does it make it 100% balanced? No. Does it fix it compared to vanillas? Undoubtably

Did you raid TBC? We stacked Locks and Shaman. There was zero reason not to.

Yeah I did. And this happened in the last 2 raids. Idk why everyone is looking at those 2 raids and think for some reason that’s all of tbc.

Because just like PServers, where the ‘optimal’ was found, why would we not apply it to the whole of the expansion after the fact?

You mean how pservers do the exact same thing as they did in tbc? You understand that just because locks and shamans are good for those raids doesn’t mean they are all that great in the other ones…right?

Sort of like how locks in vanilla are decent dps at the start and then powerup real fast in Nax. Are people stacking tons of locks right now? No, because they aren’t amazing yet.

People don’t stack locks and shamans in T4-T5 content in tbc.

No expansion will ever fix class representation, nor should they try.

There will be far more Druids in TBC because Druids are far stronger in pretty much every aspect. There will be far more Warlocks in TBC because Warlocks are absurdly powerful. There will be less Mages because while still good, Mages for the most part take a back-seat to Locks.

Point I’m trying to make is, majority of people flock to what’s good. Some people love things because of gameplay, others class fantasy. But a large majority of gamers play what makes them feel powerful.

There’s a reason everybody and their mother is a Fury Warrior, Mage or Rogue. Because they deal a lot of damage. I’m sure there are a chunk of people that love being the “barbarian” melee fighter that is Fury, some that love the idea of being the master of magic and some who love to be the assassin hiding in the shadows. For most folks, they play those classes because they pump.

There will never be perfect class representation because no matter what, some class will always be better than the rest for a particular role.

It was just as bad in every way. The ideal raid setup in TBC was even more stringent because of the 25 person cap and Bloodlust abuse.

Dungeons were even worse, forget about TBC heroics if you aren’t a Mage or Warlock.

Lol, yes they do. Locks were absolutely the best DPS class in TBC and only got better as the expansion went on. And Bloodlust was just as important at every tier of raiding.

Factually incorrect