If we were kept at one DPS in single target and aoe encounters. Someone would still play it and would be killing bosses with it… And when Warriors asked for buffs… Someone would be here on these forums saying… Well so-and-sos doing it…
They would argue that fact to not buff the class. I honestly don’t care if other classes get buffed. I’m legitimately happy for them. But people are so against other classes getting buffed for some reason, regardless if they need it or not.
More nerfs blizz, like REALLY? A historic, never before seen drop of rankings from 1 week to next of TWENTY, and the thought process was “hmmm, better do another”.
Did WCL change the value of AOE on the 4th boss? I read somewhere those little adds are no longer counted in logs. And given this is true, that would be pretty large hit to Fury’s overall DPS for that boss, in which case… the nerfs were not a big of a deal.
Swap it to 95th, but yes, demo is only slightly above us on boss dam and a bit below us on overall; so demo is as crushed as us, and it’s terrible.
The tuning this patch thus far is quite simply unacceptable; at least godcomps broken-ness was only present in M+, the current oppressive classes are oppressive in AOE fights, ST fights, and M+ as a whole. This is wild.
Did WCL change the 4th boss’s attributed damage though? I know Fury ST is fairly weak, just curious “how bad” it will be, since, as you said, nerfs havent landed yet.
And just in case I’m missing something, im not arguing, just questioning why they dropped so hard
I have played with some ferals in m+, they are rare, but they pump. Motw, rebirth are awesome for pugs, especially with warrior being popular currently, and resto druid sucks.