Class design is strange. Low skill classes should deal less damage

No, wait, I actually do know who you are.

You’re the warlock who can’t read basic graphs lmao

Anyways, moving on.

4 Likes

Step down from your high horse, it doesn’t take a genius to understand that making certain classes simply worse on dps will decrease class representation, you’re not a god sent about it.

1 Like

I’m saying that as someone that has played BM and arcane at mythic raid levels and mid tier keys saying anyone can pick up and master arcane easily is being intellectually dishonest and only someone that doesn’t know what they are talking about would say that.

1 Like

I can read graphs just fine.

You’re the one commenting on content you don’t do.

I’m not on a high horse.

Someone that doesn’t do the content can’t make a credible argument about content they don’t do.

You’re acting like tuning some classes a small bit will magically make them not viable.

Eh, it’s more that patchwork DPS is a damn near irrelevant metric for raid viability and that how / when you do your damage, as well as utility is significantly more relevant.

What’s even the point in tweaking them in the first place then? Just to make people feel bad about their choices?

2 Likes

Attempting to balance the classes. This game also rewards difficulty over simplicity.

That’s why good arcane mages will do a ton more damage than bad arcane mages.

The setup to do damage between arcane and BM is night and day different. There should be a higher reward for doing a harder damage setup. That reward would be higher damage.

So you’re saying you’ve mastered both BM and arcane thus proving my point?

I never said I mastered them. Just that I have played them at a higher level than most people.

BM is very easy and forgiving. Arcane is not.

Do you know about the gaming design where if you give players something simply better on all aspects, that this choice will become the better choice and nobody will then pick the other one because it’s worse?
You’re just being mad that others are having fun.

Ahh yes…another Delfaux thread. Just because you think, for whatever reason, that one class is less skill than another, doesn’t mean that class should be gimped in damage. It is actively something that would do more harm than good.

I’m sure you try your very hardest.

I didn’t realize you were the opinion police and can decide who is and isn’t allowed to have an opinion on something. My apologies, sir.

You’re free to ignore it if it bothers you that much ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Fun is subjective.

I’m not mad at all. I’m just giving an objective opinion as someone that’s maining hunter next expansion.

And I’m giving you my opinion from the perspective of a game dev, that your design decisions are actually bad for the game and the players enjoying those classes.

Personal shots because you can’t refute facts is pretty cringe.

It’s called credibility. I never said you can’t have an opinion. I’m just saying it’s pretty much worthless.

It doesn’t bother me. I just tend to correct incorrect information.

2 Likes

Using this logic, then hunters should be nerfed.

1 Like

You work for Blizz?

Which part of im maining hunter did you not understand?

BM being nerfed by a small percentage doesn’t affect the majority of the people playing them.

That wasn’t a personal shot. I’m sorry you perceived it as such.

Maybe get some thicker skin, I guess?

Blizzard thanks you for your diligence. I’m sure the superiority complex you feel has made all the difference for you LMAO

Your confusing calling you cringe for me being upset. It’s just me pointing out you have no argument so you resorted to taking shots.

I couldn’t care less if someone with no credibility tried to hurt my feelings.

I’m sorry you dislike facts.

1 Like

I don’t need to to understand what I’m talking about. Go read game design documents.
The problem you’re creating is called dominant strategy, it’s a real thing and you should look into it before you try arguing more about it.