Why? Fury has plenty of representation in raids right now.
And you are also going to take 1 warrior, it doesn’t matter how many dps specs warriors have, you are playing fury, or you’re not in a core raid spot. Yet it’s fine for paladins to have a core raid spot for each spec they have?
And ret didn’t?
Sure maybe raiding. However this was an overall change to the class, not just raiding. Besides there are absolutely guilds that will take a warrior regardless if they’re fury or arms. If your guild only wants what’s best preforming rather than what you want to play, you’re in a sweatier guild and should probably look for something a little more casual.
So why did ret get buffed then? They could of done exactly this…
Nope, no they couldn’t. Not without changing their role entirely.
Ret couldn’t join casual guilds to get into a raid? 
You realise ret was out dpsing arms without the buff right?
Sure they could, but even in a more casual guild often times the 1 ret paladin you might take likely already had their spot filled.
Like I said, I’m not even saying warrior shouldn’t be buffed… I’ve said that a few times above.
You realise ret is more preferred than warrior in general rn right? Added utility and doing about the same dps.
Once again you realize I have never once argued against warriors receiving a buff right?
You told me to join a casual guild on a warrior because I was able to but apparently ret were not able to even get a raid spot in a casual guild even though they are preferred over having a warrior?
I also said this to you 3 hour ago, but here we are.
And you just told me that rets were in a worse spot to warriors, despite rets having the same amount of raid spots as the entire warrior class
Where did I say they’re in a worse spot? I’m concerned now. It seems now you’re seeing things that aren’t real. You feeling okay, Yama?
You literally said warriors can get a spot in a casual raid but ret paladins can’t?
Where did I say they’re in a worse spot though? lol I never said they were. Simply that Blizzard made it so Paladin’s only dps spec did a bit more damage because they didn’t have another dps spec they could play instead. Warriors given they’re bottom no matter what spec they play should get buffed in some regard. So, I’m really not even sure why we’re having this conversation tbh.
Okay cool, so buffing a beyond over represented class with 2 god tier specs to bring the third into viable is healthier for the game than helping warriors who have 2 completely useless dps specs and a meh level tank spec.
yeah good call blizz
2 Likes
Please read my responses. I never once said Warriors SHOULDN’T BE buffed, in fact I agreed they should be. I simply explained why Ret was given a buff period.