Trick is, don’t let it bother you. Remember, people who are on the strong side of the debate let their arguments talk for them. The more people trash talk you the weaker their argument really is. You know it’s weak and more important they know it’s weak.
The fallacy of ad hominem, when you can’t attack the message, attack the messenger. It’s the bread and butter of the logically challenged.
And very rude. She demands proof when we give personal stories about why anon is bad, then she calls us liars when we give her proof, saying it’s fake. She preaches kindness and tolerance yet she offers none herself unless you agree with her.
i have already participated in this discussion and directly answered your question in a prior post, sorry but i am not going to re-post and repeat myself when the tools are there for you to re-read the thread.
personally i believe this should be a civil discussion regarding the topic of anonymous posting, not the personality of the OP.
this is one of the issues that anonymous posting would rectify: people ignoring the actual topic of the thread to post negativity about the person that posted the topic.
if this thread was written by an anonymous poster, we would have more discussion regarding the topic at hand, which would be very beneficial to all parties.