It has everything to do with what you said.
Only if you doing a practical example and repeating you yourself to show how much you can repeat the same things even if I dont care.
I know they are wrong in their arguments, Iknow it has nothing to do with anything but doing it or not.
But your arguments are as useless, because they make as much sense and they are as much inconsistent.
How do they not make sense? Could you elaborate please?
If something exists in the lore they should be in the game. I dont see how that does NOT make sense especially when blizzard are willing to put in incubuses (who just happen to be male Succubus basically) If they can do one thing for one gender. Why not the other?
1 Like
Safe Journey.
Satyress is the female equivalent to satyrs. They are entirely an invention of post-Roman European artists, as the Greek satyrs were exclusively male and the closest there was to female counterparts were the nymphs, altogether different creatures who, however, were nature spirits or deities like the satyrs.
So, no.
NEXT!
Semper Fi! 
Right Ok Seeing as you cant bring up a reason I will just take it that you dislike the argument being brought forth. Until Proven otherwise I will assume this.
And I suppose that is how you feel. Even if you cant bring anything up to disprove meâŚ
But I choose to respect you. Thank you for actually trying.
Finninbas, I and about four others here have done everything but drag the Creator-of-All-That-Is into the argument with evidence from linguistic archeology, history, academia, logical philosophy, and analysis of the mythology from which the satyr has been appropriated.
I suspect that if we managed to locate the Creator-of-All-That-Is and dragged her into the forums and had HER tell you youâre wrong, youâd still say that wasnât âprovenâ to your satisfaction.
Quit even pretending youâre not anything but a troll, please.
There is no such thing as a female satyr.
Nymphs are the females from that âspeciesâ
The âCreatorâ you are referring to in the context and relation to the question about âFemale Satyr in WoWâ (IE Have a female model for Warcraft satyrs) is in fact AGREEING with me.
How Do i know this?
As has been pointed out multiple times. The creator is BLIZZARDS Story and Franchise development. They say there exists female satyrs And it is Evident in the game which is literally the highest form of Canon lore that exists.
I am sorry that you are wrong. And that Blizzard has Defiled Greek mythology so hard for you but its time to move on.
Please.
Blizzard has as much power over WARCRAFT as BLIZZARD has over its other Franchises. Frankly they have as much power over it as Disney have over star wars or Marvel or lucasarts have over star wars. As a Franchise. If they want to retcon something out of Existence to appease Greek mythology (why?) they can do that.
I admit you have not convinced me of much to exit my ignore list.
If you are gonna accuse me of âLOVING THE LORE TO THE POINT OF WORSHIPâ or something like that again. I think my posting history would make you regret Posting that ever again I am severely critical of the lore. Hell I am probably one of its biggest critics. But just because the lore sucks etc etc and story etc etc doesnt mean that everything associated with it should be removed.
Wrong again.
Iâm speaking of the actual creator of the universe, not content creators at Blizzard.
B-bye.
The real life universe? Because i know this is a mythology discussion but how is that relevant?
2 Likes
Right⌠Bringing in the religious/spiritual arguments again. How unsurprising.
It is as relevant to the topic as saying âThese meatballs are tastyâ while eating a hot dog.
Except they havenât. All Satyrs in game are male. There are zero females.
A woman that was transformed into a Satyr. (she is also a lesbian but that is beside the point)
1 Like
The âCreatorsâ in this universe are the devs, and if they wanted it done, they would have. They can change lore, change past, change anything and make it happen. There is no argument needed or compelling it.
THe only thing is:
There is no reason either.
The only thing in it is âI want satyr with boobsâ rhetoric disguised as âartâ.
The same logic could be applied to Incubus âIts just succubus without boobsâ
Yet here we are. So That logic went out the window pretty fast.
This is irrelevant. All of mythology is irrelevant. Blizzard has their own story version with a female satyr already within their games.
And it is irrelevant and also wrong.
Hard to find something in this whole thread that isnt.
This is very offensive to women that you believe this is what females are.