I understand the point of making alter only last 5 seconds being suggested, and I agree that it would be a good change.
Unnecessary insults aside, the ‘not understanding’ is on you.
The op just didn’t really make complete sense from reading it.
It starts off with an outcry that all 3 mage specs do disgustingly high dps, and subsequently spirals into suggestions that comprise both nerfs and buffs to the class, neither of which has anything to do with the high dps aspect.
I suppose the op did also say “too immortal” as well, but it didn’t seem to be the main point of the post.
Either way, I welcome buffing mage so that alter only lasts 5 seconds in PvP combat but is undispellable. I also agree with the op’s suggestion for gutting Master of Time (the part that resets blink and shimmer), as this does make Alter Time a pretty toxic ability.
Having said that, none of the mage specs are as bad as the op is making them out to be (e.g., as evidenced by there being less mages at 2400+ in 3v3, even when combining all three specs, than assassination rogue, dh, and ret paladin). That type of damage isn’t really sustainable, and isn’t going to happen unless the mage is ignored completely while bursting (imo).
Many other specs do way more oppressive damage AND are a lot tankier (or more immortal lol) to boot, which is why I figured that the op is probably making their post from a warrior pov.
Anyway, thank you for your constructive input to the conversation [hopefully the tone I’m conveying reaches you this time]