Calling it Body 1 & Body 2 feels objectifying

A low res texture obviously made from scratch was someone at Blizzard ? Are you sure you know what you’re talking about ?

I don’t think we’re talking about the same thing. The texture I’m talking about is literally lower res than the Sprites in Leisure Suit Larry III EGA.

No, one was. The one based on an actual real world painting by Titian, the Reclining Nude.

Not anyone who worked at Blizzard.

But it’s the lounging pic that was replaced with fruits.

Like, you can keep arguing this point, but you’re conflating 2 things that are entirely unrelated.

1 Like

No, one is a right wing-esque puritanical change, ie, changing Renaissance inspired art for Fruit.

You’re not Jack Thompson are you ?

1 Like

Nowhere in the text of this game are you referred to as either of these, so there is nothing objectifying and nothing to be uoset over.

I do not wish to get into the middle of this argument, but I do not believe anyone has said you were lying.

That is actuality acknowledging what you have given. They are merely saying it was not noticed prior and that it proves that only icons did change.

No one has said you have lied.

Then, don’t.

It was implied that I was because somebody stated that because they didn’t see it, as if it was to “disprove” my claim that it exists.

As many have told me, “just because you don’t see it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist”.

I’ve proven its existence, therefore IDK what they were arguing with me about it.

So, what do you want to argue about? Semantics?

You are incorrect. One was replaced by fruit. One was replaced with a newer version covering up the chest of a woman and making her look manly.

No, they merely stated that they had not seen it. That is not a statement of lying.

And they had not said to the contrary. I feel you are seeing things where there are none to see. You did not lie and no one has said as such.

They were not arguing about that point at all. As a matter of fact, they backed you up on it.

I am unsure what exactly you are reading, because it is not what was said.

I do not like to see such things conflated so poorly and such misunderstanding.

1 Like

Yes, which is the one we’re talking about.

Which is the one we’re not talking about.

What am I incorrect about ? Care to actually point to what you feel is incorrect ?

2 Likes

You spoke of only one painting being replaced. If I have misunderstood then I apologize. Good day.

I spoke of a painting being replaced by fruit yes. And then someone wrongly claimed it was a rendition of a Blizzard employee when it was in fact, inspired by a renaissance painter known as Titian.

2 Likes

I will only repeat this once since you have decided to feign ignorance

2 Likes

As a way to “disprove” my statement which then paints me as a “liar”.

No, that be you and others like you.

They did. They said there are no pronouns in tooltips:

Agree.

When somebody tells me that “there’s no pronouns in tooltips” to my “there’s pronouns in tooltips” point, that implies that one of us is lying, therefore I proved that I wasn’t, and that they were, until they had to reframe it and say “I haven’t seen it”.

EDIT: They didn’t even apologize.

1 Like

I was clarifying to prevent future confusion.

1 Like

You are not correct in this thinking. You have misinterpreted. I would suggest rereading the conversation.

I can see you have no intentions of a civil conversation. Goodbye.

1 Like

They LITERALLY were trying to frame me as a “liar” by stating the opposite of what I said.

No, that would be you.

I’ll believe it, when I see it. Like the other person who said “they were leaving” but lied about it and began re-arguing.

This whole thread is cringe.

Like…

3 Likes

Your clarification was unnecessary. You refuse to acknowledge an apology and must run things into the ground. I should have known better, given you are never capable of letting a conversation go and must always have the last word. You shall go back to ignore where you belong.

1 Like

Oh now you’re just trying.

I clarified since you’re the 2nd person who was confused about the painting apparently.

Alright, that’s it. My mute didn’t work and I’m not going to sit here and read this utter crap from you.

NOWHERE did I ever call you a liar, paint you as one, nothing. I specifically said that I honestly didn’t know it was a thing. That I hadn’t noticed it. That’s nowhere NEAR calling you a liar. It’s saying I DIDN’T KNOW.

Good god what is your problem?? I literally agreed with you when you showed the screenshots! I never ONCE called you a liar.

Geebus, the crap that gets made up around here is astounding. :roll_eyes:

NOW let’s see if the damn mute works. I blame the phone.

3 Likes