Itâs not even so much about the fact that she is Calia. Itâs a strange choice sure, it could been done. But the way theyâve chosen is⌠astonishing.
There were other Forsaken people and to be fair there was one undead that had development many people liked and then he was killed (not saying he should have been a leader), but itâs a example of a story better done.
Because Calia actually has redeeming qualities beyond being attractive.
No oneâs defending Calia actually committing genocide or openly despising her people because she hasnât done any of that while Sylvanas very much has.
If they where healing without her then they wouldnât have sought her out explicitly because she could help them.
You seem to think that being a void elf requires me to be edgy. Iâm a high elf who happened to be present for an unfortunate incident, nothing more.
If anything I have more of a right to talk down to forsaken players who are addicted to edge because Iâm proof you can suffer something terrible without it defining you for the rest of forever.
They formed a counsel, then said counsel was executed by Sylvanas for the crime of not needing her.
Which is truly a shame, but it says more about you than it does about her.
She has already been shown to help them. You donât care because you donât actually want the Forsaken to heal.
Theyâre undead. They werenât even alive before Sylvanas had them killed.
The only ones Sylvanas spared were the ones who turned around and went right back to groveling at her feet. Any member of the counsel that still exists lost the right to lead the Forsaken then and there.
I still donât see either of that in the tweet. Again, Iâm not familiar with Twitter. Maybe youâre referencing something else. It just says she âpushedâ for the Calia plot. Nothing about it being a replacement for some random character.
Why would you think I would think that?
Iâm just trying to figure out the source of your claims. As far as I know the plot would have been different had Calia not been involved.