Calia will NOT be the new Forsaken Leader, nor join the Horde

But horde are totally not evil. Totally not.

In fact, has there ever been a war, uh I mean an attack by the horde where they didn’t kill countless of innocents/people who can’t defend themselves ?

4 Likes

They are also working them to death in the quarry

1 Like

Calia will be the Light representative and Xal’atath the Void representative when we have our Light versus Void expansion.

Her leading the Forsaken might be on the table still, but this seems to be the more obvious route.

Aw, thank you! :sparkling_heart:

On that note, I need to get over my extreme shyness and reach out for RP more. x_x

2 Likes

I too liked the Desolate Council, it was a lot more representative of the Forsaken concept of free will and choice than Sylvanas ever was. Sylvanas killing them before they had a chance to do some good was one of the worst things she did.

3 Likes

Plus after Arthas and Slyvanas you’d think we’d have an aversion to monarchs.

1 Like

Finally. Now that I can log back in, I can post on topic.

THANK. GOD.

That too. If the Forsaken go for round 3 of letting someone hold absolute power over them I’d question how rotted their brains are.

Good to know it wasn’t just me. Luckily it was midnight so I just went to sleep and came back to it fixed.

1 Like

Forsaken without racial leader?Why in the horde do we always have races without a leader?

Okay, but “death camp” is a reeeeeeeally loaded term, with its connotations from WW2 and all. I thought they’d changed their mind about going quite that far.

Apparently it was worse in the PTR, but it was changed to a goblin lumber camp or something like that.

The Kel’thuzad redemption arc starts now.

2 Likes

At least you aren’t stuck with suck @ss Anduin…

1 Like

KT liked to create undeads and kill people.

That sounds perfect for redemption.

1 Like

KT has to go to the maw is the perfect place for trash like him.

With KT the Forsaken will now be ruled by a council of Liches.

1 Like

I would agree but according to some, Blizzard’s likely to suddenly turn them into frothing at the mouth warmongers any day now.

Apparently because A) there must always be a faction war every two expansions, and B) aggression can only ever start with the Horde, not the Alliance.

At least with Calia, who even if she did become Forsaken leader, is still alliance loyal and they would have less of an excuse.

Part of the reason it always needs to stem from the Horde is that since Blizz ardently refuses to develop Horde characters outside of the same expansions they intend to remove them from the Horde … the Horde character roster never gets lasting development or powerups. Compare that to the Alliance who have a plethora of one-man-army demigods on their side…

Lets just say you think Alliance fans are frustrated how handicapped they had to be on the defensive in this conflict; could you imagine how handicapped the Blue Team would have to be to allow an Aggressor Alliance story to work? They don’t even exist in the same genre of power fantasy as the Horde anymore. If they were allowed to go all out, the Horde wouldn’t stand a chance.

4 Likes

Honestly we shouldn’t have stood much chance against the Legion, or the Scourge, given how they described how vast these respective armies were suppose to be …but, somehow, we did. Numbers and/or powers of armies clearly isn’t a real factor in these aspects.

If Blizzard wanted to make an alliance aggression storyline, they could pull it off if they wanted and still keep the truth that neither side could wipe out the other side.

1 Like