It’s weird tho bro, on other posts I’m saying that frost mage needs buffs and people are just jumping off the wall fighting me for it to not happen.
Warcraft log data doesn’t support any of the crap you are saying. Even for maximum on Thorim the number is 9538 for affli vs 8407 for fury, which is again around 12%. Even if your false claims about the gap between the outliers was true, it wouldn’t matter, cuz no mathematical approaches leaves 99% of data out and make a conclusion based on 1% of data. You know nothing about math and all you provide are fake crap with 0 logic and support.
As someone who’s main-ing fury war in p2 I wouldn’t mind a buff for fury, though I’d still rather them reverting all the buffs they did to the other classes and don’t touch class balance in WOTLK.
Fury warrior is behind many other classes for a certain margin which is around 10-15%. That’s a fact. You can nag and cry for a buff all day long in this forums, but try to use some real and meaningful data and don’t propaganda based on fake information.
1 Like
you cant read graphs, in what universe you think the number one dmg dealt on thorim is 9538 is absurd. get out.
Guy has bad numbers top damage dealing affliction lock on thorim did 13.2k dps top fury warrior did 10k dps it is a 3k dps difference even in guilds that prio a single person parsing
Go study these 2 topics in statistics:
- Boxplot Diagram
- Outliers
Or don’t and keep insisting the earth is flat…
The maximum I am referring to is the maximum of the normalized data ,not the absolute maximum which is an outlier. In the logs statistics if you hover your mouse on the bars you can see Maximum, upper quartile, medium, lower quartile and minimum. Simply speaking, the normalize maximum of Warcraft log is somewhere between to top 3-5%. Lets round it down to 5% for simplicity.
So again, based on the Warcraftlog statistics, on average a top 5% lock does about 12% more DPS than a top 5% fury warrior.
1 Like
The maximum dps that can ever be done by a warrior is 30 percent lower that a warlock, this supports my argument, and you look at a different percentile and post those numbers to support your argument… so we have gotten nowhere.
So why do you think in any guild that is full clearing all of p2 will bring 3-5 locks. And in most cases 1 fury warrior tops?
Yes lets keep changing the most successful version of the game to see how much we can ruin it before it becomes an unrecognizable mess, oh wait… it already is…
2 Likes
Yeah your experience is ruined. How could you possibly play knowing that ferals do more dmg. Hell, I agree with you, game is unplayable now.
They won’t. They already said after the last round of buffs that their goal was to not to change more. The fixed ret because in their words it was that paladins had one dps option and as we see the buff really took them nowhere. For feral they’re correcting a degenerate play style. Warriors won’t be able to separate those from what they want, but blizzard said their goal was to not do more.
And Blizzard have consistently changed their minds. Like on every comment regarding class balance - based on “player feedback”.
I don’t think “Blizzard said” is a guarantee or indicator of anything at this point.
And this was a massive backflip (based on community feedback) from when they said they would not look at buffing Ret because they already have two top tier specs in the class.
Blizzard have been saying all sorts of things - often mutually exclusive things.
About two months ago they did class change to ret paladin, and a week ago they did the same to ferals, they said they wouldn’t do that before.
Warriors can cling onto that security blanket but they wrote a brick stating their goals.
Good luck
If you’re a YouTuber with enough likes and subs to make a living out of wow classic ‘content’ and venture an opinion on class balance - watch Blizzard patch it into the game within hours.
Heck, they only rediscovered PTR when Sarthe and scottieJay told them to.
Someone at BlizzardHQ IT dept. needs to put a firewall block on social media.
What I find most interesting is that when fury tries to compare other specs they always compare themselves to the top damage…
Why aren’t y’all comparing your numbers to middle of the pack??
So, Ret’s a top damage spec now is it? Or Feral? That’s where most of the comparisons are being made. Against our “peers”.
Currently we’re on par with Ret though our average is way worse but our best is a lot better.
We were on par with Feral, but following the buff we’re not peers anymore.
Of the 3 we are the only class to receive no buffs and a couple of performance degrading bug fixes.
Really not rocket science why Warriors are suggesting they could use a little attention.
Well you’re better than ret and worse than feral. Welcome to the mid! They got attention. The answer they got was “wait”. Just isn’t the answer they wanted.
Our best is, but the vast majority of us are worse.
This is mostly due to janky buggy game play though.
A general power increase will make us too powerful. But bug fixes and QoL changes will bring up our average to be on par with our “peers”.
When you hit “All Percentiles” Fury is ahead of ret. Its just gonna be a wait game. If they scale into the middle of the pack that would be perfect!
The boxplot tells the story. The median is well behind.
Well at 75% they overtake ret and everything above that theyre better. So that was the peer you wanted to beat right?