I wonder if he thinks he’s being subtle.
1 Like
I might be the only on this forum, but I’m not at all opposed to the rend/bleed/ss arms playstyle. Is it completely against what arms has been for years? Yes, but we as community need to stop living in the past.
I think to make the bleed 
work, when you have everything on there and press avatar is should function like the old Aff coolie that made dots chunk, same cd same viability. Having 2 seperate styles to choose from would not be a bad design for Arms going forward
1 Like
We’re not feral druids man, I know Kennie prefers Fury to Arms so he’s good with whatever but most Arms players don’t want to be bleed bots as seen in BfA.
The proper way to fix Arms would be to just rework it entirely, bring csmash back into rotation.
I like both, I just shift around to whatever suits or is fun. 
I’m gna give
You an opportunity to reread what I wrote 1 more time before you impose that nonsense only because I enjoy your dear diary arc
Just because you enjoy bleed build doesn’t mean I have to agree with you; it’s boring & that’s not how I envision Arms as a spec. Not gunna apologize for that opinion or change it.
Legion had it right when it had csmash reset rather than overpower from tactician.
Go back to making fun of that Druid, clearly reading comprehension is not it for you.
Mortal Strike doesn’t have to bat 40% off a guys health bar to be fun or good. 
Bleeds are okay.
Lol, I chose to ignore that comment because it was fried, but ya go off bro.
That’s not what I meant & you know it.
I think Arms would feel better if certain specs got a bit tuned down.
Rogues and frost mages as well as devokers seem far too strong rn. All the passives slows don’t help either.
That being said, some changes would definitely be appreciated. Blademaster’s / Warlord’s torment are awful. And remove Hamstring from the gcd again
1 Like
No, you’re just a small minded man that can’t accept when he’s wrong and instead wants to keep talking in circles.
Suprised you and Swole aren’t best buds, you guys have that in common.
Imagine calling “choices” fried? Here’s a choice, don’t respond because I’m done wasting my time on you.
Lol how does not agreeing with you opinion make me ‘small minded’? I always admit when I’m wrong, but not agreeing with your opinion on how Arms should work doesn’t make me ‘wrong’; get your head out yers.
One ‘choice’ will always be better than the other, specs shouldn’t have ‘choices’ on how to play them with the exception to a minor detail aka odyn’s fury vs reck for Fury.
Stop being a derp.
I’ve always been a fan of rend as an additive to overall damage but I’m not the biggest fan of the bleed build that it’s evolved into. I agree with Kydrav on the ideal arms class design being more wod/legion alligned while still maintaining a decent rend prescence. At the end of the day I’ll play whatever is the working choice for arms because the spec has been my main for my entire time playing the game.
1 Like
never understood why they made arms warrior a bleed spec. doesnt make any sense.
2 Likes
“It’s not okay that the spec I like is bad but it is okay that the spec I don’t like is.”
Go away.
1 Like
fury should be unplayable every seas arms should be s tier
2 Likes
even though this is sarcasm, ya. fury doesn’t belong in pvp. its ok to have certain pve specs not function great in pvp. Arms is terrible in pve almost every season since the beginning of time, and now behind fury in pvp also.
imagine if blizz didn’t try to keep every spec playable in high rated pvp, how easy it would be to tune.
They already gave up on augment.
1 spec for each type of dps per class, ele and enh, feral and boomkin are ok, sure.
Augmentation is decent now, though.
i have still yet to see one in a skirm or bg… lol
I personally preferred strikes of opportunity warrior mastery. the dmg increase of MS col smash and Execute was a good one too.
But ya i think arms needs a spec rework over all.
Make it the tactician spec it is supposed to be.
1 Like