No, it won’t. Go read the thread and contribute something meaningful instead of baseless conjecture.
Your numbers still dont work. Assuming a bot earns 50g/hr, that is 1200g a day. Covers the cost of a boost.
Using the 200 hours, that is 10,000g earned by the boost. 200 hours played is only like $4 in subscription cost, less than 2 hours worth of bot farming.
So lets say its 26 hours of farming the bot boost to cover the costs. That leaves 8700g made in that 200 hours which is at least $480 profit.
Ditch it and onto the next one while the three accounts that have made nothing so far have cost $45 to run.
Not to mention that gold farmers dont have an unlimited supply of computers.
Money talks bullsh*t walks.
You are the one presuming i did not read those posts.
How about you look in the world of warcraft and see for yourself. Mage bots running to mara still in the communal gear.
Correct.
Then what happens at 400 hours? The boost has earnt 20,000g and the 3x accounts have earnt 30,000g.
At 600 hours, the boost has earned 30,000g and the the 3x have earned 60,000g.
A multiplier is much more lucrative than a slightly higher principle.
1 Like
Considering your argument had been raised and addressed multiple times in this thread, it was a logical conclusion.
Nobody said that.
Your numbers do not work either.
Cost to boost 1 account w/ Boost ($15 for sub and $30 for the boost = $45) - Gold potential for 1 account in one month: 36,000.
Cost to buy 3 accounts without a boosts ($15 sub x 3 = $45) Gold potential for 3 accounts in one month: 86,400
So for the same $45, which has the better overall results.
Doesnt matter if you want to run them for 10,000 hours. The boost has already made almost 10x the upfront cost of the three characters by the time the leveled bots are ready to start making gold.
You are also ignoring that the longer a bot runs the more likely it is to get banned.
A gold farmer can run three boosted characters for a profit of over $1400 in 8 days. Whereas the leveled characters have made nothing.
Posting this again because you clowns obviously dont play the game.
1 Like
And the more account you run the less likely all of them get banned. Your argument works against you. Why put all your eggs in one basket. The single boosted account means if it gets banned you are out $45 and have to start over.
With 3 accounts if one gets banned you are out $15 and still have two accounts going strong.
2 Likes
If one of the three gets flagged for botting, the rest will as well considering they are all running from the same machine. Mongoloid.
I don’t disagree. But at that stage, the levelled bots rapidly and dramatically outclass the boosted bot.
The most likely outcome is the one with the fewest assumptions. You are actively discrediting your position by making it contingent upon contingencies.
A perfect sign that someone is having problems defending their position, they resort to insults.
LOLOL!
1 Like
I saw it. It’s just not relevant to the conversation.
So bots using boosted characters is not relevant to a discussion on whether bots will use the boosts to their advantage?
And the other guy wonders why I’m pulling the mongoloid card out. Lmfao.
Correct. Because as I’ve always said
Youse some clowns. Not only for supporting boosts, but for seemingly be in defense of botters having a method for FASTER and EASIER profit.
$469 in 8 days. Raw profit. Dont forget this. (Thanks for reminding me to factor in full sub cost btw)
Nobody is doing that. Nobody has said anything to that effect. You’re making things up.
$469 in a little over a week whereas the other accounts have made nothing.
Blizzard has given gold farmers a method to make the equivalent of minimum wage without playing the game.
And you defend this? What a joke!