I farm all my mats on my main but have a bank alt that holds items and gold all the time. He does all my AH work to avoid all the angry people when they get undercut. After a few weeks of selling mats ill send all the profits back to my main. I do this a few different chars and some are even on different accounts
How can Blizzard tell that its me and not some random gold buyer? Id prefer not get banned when I busted my butt farming all those mats because a company decided it wasnt going to address the actual problem and went for a bandaid solution instead. And thats what banning buyers is, a bandaid solution. You hammer the source so hard that it doesnt matter how high the demand is, it wont exist. Blizzard doesnt do that.
They can tell when my alt accounts are me? Gonna doubt that
The point i was making is they need to address the obvious bots 1st. Im not beginning to believe that the company that allows flying bots to exist for months on end somehow has a knowledge on all my accounts and knows they belong to me
Doubt all you want, but you’re still making an assumption. Ultimately you don’t know. None of us do, for that matter. Should we state Blizzard isn’t doing something based on reasons we have assumed, regardless of our ignorance?
Obvious to you doesn’t mean it’s obvious to them. Maybe they know something you don’t. They won’t ever tell you, me, or anyone else how they work because if they did, then cheaters would have a better idea as to how to cheat the system.
About that. So you know mine? Im saying they should address bots first and foremost. You must disagree with that since you are debating me for some reason
That was my first post if you wanted to see that. So if you are against banning bots may i ask why?
Behold: the perfect consumer. Despite actively paying for a service, he defends the company’s lack of QA, moderation, and manpower. While others demand a better product, he is first in line to demonize them for doing so.
I’m not sure what you’re going on about now. I pointed out to the OP that you were making an assumption. I then asked you how you knew about what you were talking about it. You didn’t have an answer for that.
I cannot “debate” you if you don’t know what you’re talking about. There’s nothing there to debate. It’s just you doing guesswork.
Cant debate it because if you dont hammer the supply theres no point arguing for any other changes
Also stupid to pretend blizzard has all that info. Clearly they dont since they do nothing about the issues. Seen the same 5-6 flying bots for 6 months now. Clearly have no solution
But keep defending their inability to control their pay to play game though
He’s not defending anything. He’s suggesting they do things differently in a manner he believes will benefit everyone in the long run.
Slicy is basically telling him his system wouldn’t work, but her reasons why assume she knows how the system works right now. She doesn’t. That’s where I came in.
Blizzard loves its puppets. How anyone can defend a company that charges monthly for a service that they cant maintain as well as some free to play Pservers is beyond me.
No, the only person acting like an NPC here is you. When challenged on your presumptions, you immediately start on the, “Oh, you’re one of them, aren’t you?!”
You’ve quoted me out of context twice now. You’re clearly not interested in anything I have to say and you’re pretty much disagreeing with the OP based on reasons your imagination conjured up.
No, you’re not going to address it. You’re going to cut it up however you like and then address your cut-up in a different context. That’s what you’ve done twice now.
This one? What a great argument! Lets go through your train of thought
“Blizzard does nothing because then the bots would know what not to do!”
Holy crap that is some great logic. They have the info, choose to not use it to keep the bots off guard! If they never ban them then they can never learn!
This is very simple: You don’t have all the information Blizzard does.
You don’t know everything. Yet, you want to conclude that because you see something you believe is wrong, that you’re correct.
As an analogy, you’re spying on a friend paying money for illegal substances. You call out, “Hey, stop! Don’t do this.” The criminals bail. You’re happy at first and you start berating your friend. But then, you discover your friend is actually an undercover cop and it was a sting operation the whole time.
You acted in good faith, but on ignorance. People knew things you didn’t know.