Boost VS No Boost: Common ground

So regardless of which side of the fence you’re on, we can all agree that changing the boost to an XP bonus instead is fine right?

An XP boost (2X, 3X, whatever) would still make older content meaningful for the no boost crowd. While still providing an accelerated leveling process for the pro boost crowd.

Any of it is fine with me, honestly. They’ve already nerfed the dungeon boosting as it is (you don’t get full XP if you drop the group).

I wouldn’t mind the 3x speed or whatever. I don’t think you’ll please many people no matter which route you go. People wanna reee.

Good luck on getting people to agree on the bonus amount.

If its not at least 10X exp speed and permanent for the character till 58 then its useless imo. Boost > XP Bonus IMO.

Doesn’t matter - were getting boosts and people just need to accept it or stay in Classic.

No, that sounds much worse.

Blizzard/Activision loves money. Share holders love it more. Be thankful they came to there senses and limited it to one per account.

damn ya’ll are still complaining about this? there’s no need to compromise in a situation where one side resoundingly lost.

Blizzard made levelling easier at some point in TBC, which they said they will make available at Classic TBC launch.

This includes level 30 mounts, and less xp/level.

You need more than that?

It could work, but I’m not sure how much work would have to go into it to have Draenei and Blood Elves specifically disabled from it.

Honestly… I’d just put an XP Boost during the pre-patch like occurs with retail before expansion.

Yes. The nerf to xp they already put in the game or recruit a friend which was actually in TBC.

This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.