So did you find the part where it talks about the attunements on the box yet?
Whatâs even more hilarious is that you totally abandoned your âheâs taking me out of contextâ excuse and then shifted the goal posts to âthis is what I really meantâ
Even funnier is you missed the fact that you said this:
As if presuming we care and then say this:
So, you just presume we all care about Zipzoâs PvPing. But when someone else mention it, Zipzo says, âI donât see why anybody has to careâŠâ
Yeah, just degrade other people for being exactly like you and speaking their mind. Thatâs the way to winâem!
Iâm not moving the goal posts at all, I stand by all of those words. You literally did take it out of context.
You took back and forth statements, omitted all of the posts I was responding to, and tried to make it out like I contradicted myself, when I didnât at all in the proper context.
So basically they were working on it before Ralph they just didnât get a chance to implement it or finish it until Affer wrath dropped.
Thatâs what this says to me
No you donât. You couldnât possibly stand by those words otherwise you wouldnât have spent several paragraphs trying to explain why saying you were ignoring something you also said you were actively engaged in was somehow not a contradiction.
You are rewriting the English language right now in an attempt to make yourself not look like an utter hypocrite. It is amazing the level of mental gymnastics youâre attempting to engage in right now.
Of course they were. The Wrath of the Lich King expansion was probably in the latter stages of development by June of 2008. They were probably already working on dungeon finder, too. For the next expansion, not TBC.
When did Ralph enter the equation?
Itâs not mental gymnastics.
Itâs actually quite tame linguistic nuance thatâŠis rather embarrassing to watch you fumble over.
I 100% stand by every word.
Attunements much like only having one talent spec arenât a defining feature of TBC. Its almost like the primary features are experiencing the new zones, leveling to the increased level cap, riding a flying mount, and creating a blood elf or draenei.
Classic TBC is about going back and enjoying those things, not having a carbon copy of the game as it was in 2007. If it was I would be able to enslave elite demons like Makazrodon in SMV to farm with, because thats what I used to do back at launch.
So you think removing attunements would be fine for TBCC?
Job Title:
Technical Designer - World of Warcraft Classic
- Re-create earlier version of dungeon and raid content and help design systems
Iâm a bad speller sorry You know what I meant I meant wrath
News flash!! Attunements get removed shortly after Sunwell. So no, removing them wouldnât be an issue.
Yes Iâm awareâŠthey were removed because at that point, they werenât needed.
They also let you run straight to Kael and Vashj. It was a convenience patch because it was considered old content at that point.
Iâm totally fine with them removing attunements after Sunwell in TBCC too.
I think itâs called âschizophrenia.â Very basically the capacity to hold several contradicting ideas at once and attempting to retain oneâs sanity as you do so.
Reminds me of Dalia Dippolito trying to convince her husband and the police that the video evidence was not real even though everyone saw it and heard what she said.
oh⊠so you mean in order to play a 15 yr old game, you have to use more advanced and corrected technology current with today? imagine that.
Nah, man, itâs ânuanceâ which means you want what you donât want and you donât want what you want. It makes total sense, right?
1 Like
yep.
/10char
Why would you work for money?
To have nice things!
You mean in real life?
Because thatâs how itâs done today. People work for money and then they spend that money on gold.