Blizzard working on Dual Spec as early as June of 2008

It doesn’t list a great many things that are actually there.

It doesn’t list attunements either, doesn’t mean I want them removed.

For the sake of pointing out hypocrisy.

1 Like

Right so pointing out that what I’m saying is my opinion is hypocrisy…

Delusional…

It’s kinda strange… players then asking for it. Now players are asking for it today!

list of features:

Pilot Flying Mounts
Battle to Level 70
Seize the Dark Frontier
Master Two Bold New Races

nope nothing about “Limit Yourself to One Exciting Talent Tree!”

Nothing about “do arduous required quest lines that bar you from the content we offer!” either.

These were particularly funny!

1 Like

Yup, typical you, taking everything completely out of context for cheap points.

LMAO

1 Like

Yeah, I also play Arena.

I’ve ignored it for a couple years now but yeah I do play it.

Yea I started playing in TBC and honestly was kinda confused when I was told you don’t unlock 2 spec saves on hitting 70. Made no sense to me for classes that did more than 1 role. Remember pretty much everyone I played with back then wanting dual spec, the people I play with now want dual spec. Blizzard said some changes based on community feedback, they’re getting it. I enjoy all the people who make the no dual spec argument on the no changes stuff when that died in classic. Sorry for the novel. Just throwin some support for most of your posts as they’re actually pretty logical.

1 Like

A highly subjective opinion, many people think it would improve the actual gameplay of TBC.

For everyone reading, I’m going to post the same quotes again and inform you that you can just click on the upper right portion of any of these and see the full thing.

Here’s the same quotes again:

The quotes aren’t even fully quoted.

It’s dishonest tripe.

Incapable of processing nuance. Embarrassing.

The context of those conversations makes everything I said completely valid.

You just got bodied. Straight up double flawless victory uppercut into the pit of spikes bodied.

He says this after I’ve said this:

And this:

He just pretends people don’t say what they say and repeats what he says again and again and again.

Whatever you say boss.

Here’s an example where you are taking these two quotes completely out of context just to serve a complete disingenuous purpose.

I do play arena. I am an arena player. I have a long history with arena.

However, I’m currently one of those players that is ignoring arena, because of how Blizzard has mucked it up (a very common sentiment amongst all PvPers atm).

I know it’s difficult for you to interpret nuance, but I think if you try really, really, really hard, you might be able to see how these are not contradictory statements.

Of course as somebody who seems to read posts by skipping every other line and then quoting the first sentence like you’ve got a real zinger on your hands you have to let fly, I’m not going to hold my breath.

I don’t even really see how these are a contradiction. I do BG very frequently, and I also don’t care if somebody I don’t know doesn’t PvP because he’s too lazy to farm 50g. These two statements are not in contradiction with one another even though you quoted them in a way to make it seem like they are…?

At this point it’s just sad really.

You want a feature so bad, and it really must hurt deep to know that the likelihood is painfully low. I know what you’re going through, I’ve bought lotto tickets before.

No dual spec. It’s immune to #somechanges because it’s a design tenet. The end.

:rofl:

"I’m on a diet and I’m trying to lose weight.

However, I also eat a lot of chocolate cake and pizza!

If you don’t understand that, you are incapable of nuance!"

Yeah hilarious…!

…if it was anything even close to resembling an accurate analogy.

Honestly *yawn, at this point. You’re as one-note as they come.