then perhaps you need to go back and re-read the thread before it got locked.
yea, all nine of them. they loved it sooo much they agreed to do it once a week for one game if only lildude showed up. But alas, when he did show up, he usually just got online from 1v1 a whole class of 4th graders and only ran around the bg on his shaman. Lildude quit playing shortly after.
I did read the thread. Not sure what youâre getting at?
The rest of your comment could almost be taken seriously except for the fact that Lildude quit in BC when arena proved he wasnât good at PVP and separation occurred in WotLK.
Agreed. And Iâve never really twinked in the level 9âs, but as a 70, I had no issues getting queues with my twinks.
I think youâre misinterpreting what I mean. And thatâs okay! I havenât really discussed the implications at length. Iâll try and sum it up here:
Before the separation was lifted, levelers could only face other levelers and twinks could only face other twinks. While it wasnât perfect, gear disparity wasnât too high⊠not unless their character was formerly a twink and they turned their experience back on. Which is negligible because theyâd level out of the bracket in no time under the current system (probably just one BG, actually).
On the other hand, players with their experience turned off could only face other players thatâve done the same. Thus, queue times were pretty high. But they were facing people of relatively equal footing gear-wise.
Fast-forward to now, where twinks are back in leveling BGs (an intended alternative method of leveling, according to Blizzard), and the gear disparity is so high that the amount of twinks on your team typically determines the outcome. Thus, you feel useless if youâre not a twink yourself unless youâre fighting other levelers.
Now in the system I was proposing â where again, twinks and non-twinks could both queue â queue times are of no consequence, players can optionally choose to queue with gear/level relevance enabled/disabled, and others that wish to fight on skill alone would have that option. All with two buttons.
Now of course the one thatâs gear-dependent would be far less popular amongst levelers because⊠well, their gear isnât gonna be up to snuff, usually. And thatâs okay! Those queues would take about as long as they had before, and twinks would have the âequalizedâ BGs as an option in the meanwhile.
No oneâs fun being stomped out, twinks are in the same queues with everyone else. Voila!
Then we can get back to complaining about FotM classes. I kinda miss that being the worst issue. >_>
Edit: Should I just make a separate thread on these ideas to gain some constructive criticism?
Who knows, maybe it could work. From my point of view the âgear mattersâ queue would act exactly the same as the old version of xp-off queues, and bgs would rarely pop. Levelers with basic gear wouldnât choose it, therefore drastically increasing the queue time, which in turn would cause those with good gear to join the ânormalizedâ bgs just because they donât want to sit around for 45+ mins waiting for a queue pop.
Aside from this, to be completely honest, the gear is just half the battle. My damage comes from utilities I buy off the auction house that helps me pwn faces. Saltwater/Third wind pots, drums, rage pots, swiftness potions, gliders, nets, invisibility pots, noggen elixir, flasks, oils etc etc. God knows if the casuals got their way theyâd be on these forums the very next day complaining about utilities lol
70s had rated arenas and BGs for a good period of time, which was very attractive in building that bracket. However, there are other brackets than just the 70s. Itâs nice that we were able to get games. Other brackets should be able to get into games too.
Perhaps if they brought ratings back for the lower levels it would give the folks that want lower level competition something to focus on.
Yeah, thatâs what I meant before. I tried thinking around that⊠maybe offering extra incentives to queue for it, like bonus experience? Iâd actually risk it then. Maybe it gives TRIPLE the experience.
Anywho, thanks for seeing where Iâm coming from there. I think youâre right that itâd face longer queues times on average by default, but with time, I think that kind of system would gain popularity. Iâm actually tempted to make another twink now thinking about it.
Well I mean, in that âequalizedâ BG or whatever itâd be called, I could see 'em being unusable in there. But with the fact that theyâre openly accessible to everyone, maybe not? Iâd rather be in a setting thatâs the main complaint anyway, honestly.
Iâd see no problem with that. 70âs arenas/BGs/etc. were fun as heck, would love to do 'em as a 19 or something.