In summary: This is an exaggeration of what might happen based off of nothing but assumptions and bias.
Doesn’t matter anyways, because Baine is supported by both Thrall and Saurfang, so what you just said means nothing because Saurfang and Baine are both working together and share the same goals.
But again, it really doesn’t matter because the Warchief almost certainly will be neither Baine, Saurfang, nor Sylvanas. The Warchief title is most likely to return to Thrall.
Lol if Anduin tells Baine to give the NE Darkshore and Ashenvale back you think Baine would say no? If Anduin tells him to vacate Arathi? Hillsbrad? If Anduin tries to establish “peace” with the Forsaken by allowing them back into Lordaeron but under Alliance rule? If Anduin wants to build a fort in the middle of S. Barrens, you think Baine would actually say no?
Yes. Because it makes sense. This group thinks the burning of Teldrassil was wrong.
What’s up with Hillsbrad? Also, no. I don’t think he’ll vacate Arathi, just demilitarize it against the Alliance since they don’t have to defend Quel’thalas anymore.
Why would Anduin do that? Because he wouldn’t. Regardless, Baine would allow his people to do as they please, because he respects them.
Why so specifically Barrens? Are you seriously talking about Camp Taurajo? And no. Baine would decline since there’s no need for war, so a fort wouldn’t even be there.
Again an example of exaggeration and bias. Baine was once asked if he would abandon the Horde when Garrosh was Warchief. Baine said no, because he wouldn’t dare abandon his people.
Oh well, I know you hate Baine without reason, but I’m sorry, Thrall is more likely to be Warchief anyways, and he is in support of Baine’s actions. You’ll have to get used to him, and if you don’t like it? The Alliance is there waiting for you.