because right now you are saying the same thing as “well BWL is so easy its cleared in 43 minutes” when you know darn well you take 3+ hours or multiple days still.
Sure, we good. It happend. Maybe quite often in the first few days before the horde learned how to deal with it and actually completed their recall trinket quest.
and now the rest of the horde cling onto it assuming that’s the only thing the alliance will be happy with and that somehow your 100% winrate is then justified.
it very much is how math works, sample size of 148 games and 1 win, if you’re using no decimals and rounding to the nearest whole it comes out to 100% winrate for horde.
Yes, I too, can bend the data in loops to make it fit a very absurd criteria that supports my confirmation bias. For example, I met a gnome yesterday and he was a terrible person. From my sample size of 1, 100% of gnomes are horrible people.
Factually true, but ridiculous to use a statistic like that to prove a point.
If you have to round up or down or sideways to get something to an absolute like 100% or 0%, it’s not an absolute. That’s why they’re called absolutes.
But that assumes we’re close enough to 100% for your rounding to remotely make sense in the first place…
…which takes us to #2:
Your turn. You asked me for screenshots earlier, I provided hard evidence. Citation needed here my dude. Show me a log with 148:1.
Because even after WSG meta took over and AV premades were broken, I’ve still lost 3 of the last 20 AVs. That’s not close to 100% win rate, and not nearly as drastic as the 148:1 you’re trying to spout off about.
Unlike you, I’m also able to provide evidence to back my stance, because I believe in facts, and not spreading misinformation and garbage on the internet:
I’m not a condom salesman, I don’t need to round DOWN to the nearest whole number.
(I also don’t know which addon you are using to keep track of winrates, i’d apreciate if you told me)
I also don’t have the magical powers to post links
here’s what you do, reddit: wow classic, search AV, second result is 1/115, 4th down is 1/81 (huh, not 100% on that one), further down another one.