NEWS ALERT!
RDF was removed so that the current devs can implement something to show they aren’t completely useless.
Sorry not sorry, the previous devs who made WoTLK made a great game. Current devs? Absolute garbage.
this i absolutely agree with. current dev’s are as useless as a pre teen trying to argue with someone who doesnt care about arguing, yet still try’s to argue with them. bring back whooping sticks!
It is NOT the same thing, stop spreading Fake News.
What you think about RDF puts you in the Minority, a MAJORITY of people do NOT want RDF as it is a RETAIL mechanic and will kill Social Interactions.
The current tool is FAR superior to RDF.
when a pre teen tries to make a solid point but instead makes an excuse, but mom these guys are spilling facts i have to disprove them
Are you talking about yourself?
that would be directed at you my little weasel.
If this is the type of toxicity that RDF brings then they can keep it out of MY Community…
your community, says the lvl 10 alliance player with multiple characters. lets see who the real person is behind door number 3
It’s just my alt and my main bud, I don’t use multiple forum alts unlike you pro-RDF trolls.
unlike us pro RDF trolls, says the ma’am behind the RDF tag. i think its time to shut this post down
Now you’re assuming genders too and wanting the thread to get shut down? I have done MORE for this Community then you ever will, I will SAVE Classic from pro-RDF bullies like you.
Rdf, I don’t know you keep up the good fight against these Lobby Kings, but I’m sure glad you do. You truly are a pillar of the Classic Community.
There’s no need to start verbally attacking people and trying to get the post closed down.
The final stage of grief - acceptance - will come soon enough. You’re and pRO-RDFers in the 2nd phase of that boss, and we’ve already cleared it.
verbally attacking, oh if i could only literally do that to a pure troll. youre forgetting the point of this topic. youre deliberately arguing with multiple characters of your own to make it look like a valid point. not hard to look up characters. good riddance.
if youre against it, you have to give solid reasons and proof. not bounce between multiple characters arguing with people, he say she say mentality.
and yes this thread needs to get shut down. derailed from the very reason it started. point blank
That’s utterly false, most of the replies are discussing how the problems of RDF, thousands of posts but you want it to be closed because it was “derailed”. I feel like you just want to censor this popular community thread for not wanting RDF.
oh i could care less about closing any topic. ive read through a good portion of this thread and its you and 3 other ppl going back and forth. majority of the ppl left the comments due to knowing that its prolly you swapping between characters or accounts to make this thread seem like its an active thread.
if you want this thread to stay active and open. it needs valid proof of pro’s and con’s. not just a one sided pov. then calling the ppl that want an RDF pro RDF’ers. Than when you get called out you play the victim card. That right there is called pure trolling and baiting at its very finest.
so like i said. this thread needs to be closed. it derailed from its original topic. am i trying to censor anyone, no. its a valid point of it a topic derails it needs to either be put back on course which it looks like this thread has been attempted to multiple times by a vast amount of people but u and 1 other person keeps derailing it in a trolling manner.
Could we instead get cross realm grouping with bnet friends only? So I can get off Benediction while still being able to raid with friends.
No this would kill Server Identity.
Or it’ll exist because it’s a forum and every opinion is valid, anti-RDF happens to be the MAJORITY.
Oh yeah so much server identity on benediction, its basically a retail cross realm server at this point with how huge it is. Most people I group with I never see again.
It is literally the same thing stop pretending it is not, just cause you wanted to backtrack on what you said on page 1.