More Fake News, this is why pro-RDF lost.
You realize that this post was almost entirely a quote of things from an article, right? The people being interviewed were the people running the WoW Classic show.
Blizz keeping RDF from wrath classic is the best thing they’ve done in a decade.
1 Like
Yes I know, might look like im responding to you, but just responding to the developers indirectly because they are very out of touch.
That is a Fanmade Chart, it is NOT accurate. I have posted the ACCURATE one MANY times.
Post it again then.
By the way that chart is the official Activision-Blizzard released chart. I know this because I’ve seen it from the source.
2 Likes
It is not fan made.
It is accurate.
Cope.
Cope harder.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/3cweto/wow_subscriber_graph_from_200515/
3 Likes
Rdf-Daggerspine is just a huge troll, he doesn’t care about facts.
3 Likes
odd that there was such a huge drop in the end.
Warlords of Draenor. It’s also when they decided to stop reporting subscription counts to shareholders.
2 Likes
Yea so Rdf wasnt enough to keep the subs?
Which end?
People left for other reasons, namely that the game was just bad by that point.
1 Like
due in part to RDF
source???
tip: a source that starts with letter “A” and ends with the letters “ss” does not count towards as a valid source.
3 Likes
The main point of contention for a part of the dropped subs was the addition of reduced difficulty raids to the system, but most of it was just the game being bad by that point.
2 Likes
He’s his own source, because he’s personal friends with every single person who has since unsubscribed and they all told him.
1 Like
No he makes some sense.
If RDF alone is the reason the subs went up in wrath. Then you have to conclude that subs went down when RDF was found to be lacking.
either that or RDF really has no basis on subcount and its really more about the rest of the expansion.
3 Likes