Librams are BoE, the Arcanums are BoP, but if you enchanted something for someone else THEY were in possession of the item being enchanted, right?
Imo, the best course of action is to stop it from going onto raid items and change it so boes can get them like it used to be.
3 Likes
yes
and i am transposing libram with arcanum
libram is what i gave to get the arcanum
the arcanum is what i cast on someone else
? what does this mean exactly ?
Make it so you can only enchant BOE and not BOP items?
If so, that is not terribly good?
Either remove the items that are enchanted/remove the enchant/make enchanted items only usable for the classes they are supposed to be specific to or make it so you can just trade the enchants. People crying that it should remain as it was in Vanilla are clearly forgetting the fact that information on things such as this was not spread half as widely as it is now. You are basically making people exploit cross class enchants if they want to optimal.
You can say âwell you donât have to do itâ which is a complete cop out unless you are in a casual guild that doesnât care about making people take the most optimal choices. Classic has been theorycrafted to death most guilds that care about PVE will expect raiders do this convoluted exploit if itâs beneficial.
2 Likes
Are you referring to oomkins? IDK what this boomkin you speak of is. ⊠Lol
As a DPS Warrior and Enhancement Shaman raider, I can tell you for certain that the class enchants are totally useless for many class/spec combos.
We SHOULD be allowed to pick another class enchant. For example, the Hunter enchant, even with the useless Ranged Attack Power, would be a huge, huge upgrade for DPS Warriors.
Itâs ridiculously poor game design, that only certain classes/specs will benefit from these enchants.
classic has never been #nochanges and it never will be.
this is not a bug or an exploit. it was doable in OG Vanilla, and was never changed in retail, even to this day. People like the OP are why we canât have nice things.
Ranged AP and 1% hit? The rogue one is 28 AP which would be better considering the HS Queueing macro
Can we just take a moment to appreciate how something that wasnât originally in Vanilla (2hr trade window) is now having âpotentialâ massive changes to loot priority? Like just think about it. Itâs pretty friggin amazing how something that was downplayed so heavily as ânot having a massive impactâ may very well haveâŠa massive impact hahahaha.
6 Likes
does this work with loot trading?
For BoE items it was, but for soulbound items it was not because the soul bound items could never be traded after the fact of looting in vanilla.
This exploit exists because Blizzard included with this legion client the ability to trade items that are bop.
There is an argument that because it has always existed it shouldnât be removed (for boeâs).
The problem is that sub 1% of the community used this bug in 2005-2006. The current way classic is played, you would be disadvantaged in a competitive sense if you are the person who chose not to do it. Itâs the equivalent of using a 60hz monitor in an FPS game when everyone else is 144hz.
3 Likes
Itâs cute that you had nothing better to do other than being so cute. The sad thing is that I am not upset with the change, just the blatant lie.
I donât believe anyone has posted a confirmed ZG cross-class chant. Iâve done shoulders 6x today and bricked Bloodvine pants 2x today attempting this⊠Either unlucky or doesnât exist.
Only if twinking. It would be more like a 140hz monitor if there was one vs 144hz for endgame.
I wouldnât call it massive⊠2% spell hit is rounding error territory considering you still have an unmitigated 1% chance to miss.
I thought figuring out a way to get enchants on other classes was an interesting game mechanic.
i never go oom if I use consumables >_>