I disagree. That’s your opinion and not based on anything objective.
I look forward to it.
Here’s four I found in a few minutes that dismiss counterarguments as “trolling” or “hating”.
Let me go get some ones that claim specifically to objectivity.
1 Like
Now all you have to do is prove that those people aren’t expressing their opinion and you’re home free.
Yeah that would be good because so far it looks to me like your full of sh. That’s just my opinion, I’m not claiming it’s an objective fact.
I know you’re just being obtuse. You can read. You know what they said. Unless they forgot to link their arguments, those comments were unrelated.
Serious question: why are you so obsessed with everyone accepting your opinion as correct? Why do you think such absurd lengths to be contrarian?
I know you’re smarter than that, you’ve demonstrated it. This is just petulant.
3 Likes
Yes, I can read and in my opinion most everything people post here is just their opinion. I don’t need people to post “imo” in every sentence to figure that out. Can you read?
Why are you so obsessed with making me accept your opinion that some here are claiming objective superiority? In my opinion that’s nonsense.
I can read. Like I can read the title of this thread in which we are currently posting: “anti-Dual Spec people are a tiny minority of Classic players”. That’s not an opinion, it’s a claim to objectivity. And a completely unsubstantiated one at that.
Considering the amount of times I’ve said
I have no idea from where you are pulling that.
1 Like
It’s an opinion. I just assume most people are smart enough to know that virtually every thing they post here is an opinion even if they don’t add “imo” as a preface to every sentence they post. I also assume most people are smart enough to know that most every thing I post here is just my opinion so most of the time I don’t preface every sentence with “imo.” I guess I was wrong in assuming that about you but I still think most people are smart enough to know that most everything I and everyone else posts here is just an opinion.
cope about it
1 Like
“Opinion” my foot.
1 Like
You incorrectly stated that as an objective fact. You should have said, “In my opinion that’s an “Opinion” my foot.”
You know you stated something that was categorically false, and you’re lashing out to cover yourself.
The petulant child act really doesn’t suit you.
4 Likes
You can just google “dual spec classic TBC polls” and see the substantiation that most people want dual spec. Why does everyone have to spoonfeed you a source you can just look up?
When you make an argument, you’re expected to support it with evidence.
I’ve looked at them. That’s not how sampling works in a survey. The methodology is flawed so the results aren’t conclusive.
1 Like
You can nitpick all you want, but the existing evidence so far shows dual spec has mass popularity. You can either speculate or look at current evidence. Where’s the surveys that show that most people DON’T want dual spec? Exactly, they don’t exist.
That’s not nitpicking. It’s simply not authoritative evidence if the methodology is flawed.
3 Likes
That’s another opinion you stated as an objective fact.
Perhaps it suits me just fine. Why do you keep stating your opinions as objective facts? It seems to me that in every post you make claims to objective superiority by your own interpretation of the phrase.
I would give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re some contrarian teenager but sadly I know you are a fully grown man in his 60s.
3 Likes
Pretty much every single poll is reproducible and shows similar results: pro dual spec is the majority opinion. That’s pretty telling. It’s obvious that no matter what evidence is presented, if not it’s submitted and peer reviewed by Nature you’re going to nitpick it as flawed.
There are have been dozens of polls on twitter, classictbc subreddit, and on youtubers and ALL of them say similar results: the people against dual spec are a minority fringe opinion.
If you can’t see the reality as it is, that’s a personal problem for yourself to figure out.
I don’t doubt that there are many people in favour of dual spec. It might even be more than half. Some of those polls even have impressive participation, I’ll give them that.
But the sampling on those polls is incorrect, so the data is necessarily skewed. Think if I attended an anti-lockdown rally and took 10,000 responses on whether they think lockdowns should end - you can guess what the outcome would be.
You can’t make any authoritative conclusions based off them, unfortunately. Those polls serve as more of a petition than an actual survey.
2 Likes
Dude calling other people contrarian when he spends all his time being one and generally annoying towards anyone who points out something obvious to you. Holy projection batman.