Another anti seething shore post

PVP Battlegrounds
1

If I wanted to play fortnite, I would. But I don’t. So please, blizz, at least let us blacklist bgs again. This one is awful.

15 Likes
2

It’s the worst bg from the little bg line-up, just like Wintergrasp is the worst epic bg

So now with Seething Shore we have even a bg that’s based on RNG? So dumb :roll_eyes: :-1:

7 Likes
3

I like it :slightly_frowning_face: but if the queue times are healthy enough for blacklist that would be nice to have again… even if it’s just one.

Not sure if the queue times are healthy on the Horde, I play Alliance.

1 Like
4

I love this Bg.

I’ve never played fortnite though.

2 Likes
5

Honestly, it seems like 75% of the regular bg’s are awful. Pass on all of them except for AB, WSG, and TP.

2 Likes
6

bring back bg blacklisting please

we never asked for u to take it away from us.

2 Likes
7

they thought forcing seething shore down everyone’s throat would improve the “lore” of BFA. Instead, everyone is saying f seething shore and azerite.

1 Like
8

Try queueing for the specific game you like. Bliz gave this option to ALL of us.

9

I like Seething Shore as Alliance. I win all the time. The people I see who hate it are generally Horde players.

10

Eh, I don’t mind it. Variety is good people!!! :pray::pray:

Unfortunately blizzard needs to understand that choice is good too… Bring back blacklist please. (And vendors because choice is King :joy:)

6 Likes
11

I guess I don’t hate Seething Shore, but it’s not my favorite battleground. The main thing I don’t like is the airships, and how they sometimes path into “UNCHARTED TERRITORY TURN BACK” when you’re waiting to res. Most of the defining features seem pretty gimmicky. But the consumables vendor and conjuring mage npc on the airships are convenient.

I do think it’s a good exercise in being aware of things on the minimap, and having to respond to different areas of the map based on a fluid situation. Sometimes those choices of when to engage/disengage and where to go can be interesting, I guess.

I try not to think about the premise of the objectives, though, which seems manifestly silly. Like, big heroes and strategists we are, scrambling around randomly on some island, playing whack-a-mole on giant earth pimples.

12

You should hear to disappointed groans in discord what that BG comes up in RBGs

2 Likes
13

Seething shore makes me insta “/cry” every time. It’s the only way I can express my true feelings about it. I hated SotA. I’ll take SotA back if it gets rid of Seething.

5 Likes
14

I kind of like it, it isn´t as slow as Battle for Gilneas that at least someone will be standing at Mine/ LH forever.

1 Like
15

It’s true, all of it.

hansolo.gif

16

Have to agree here. I like how it’s one of the BGs where you have to keep moving, kind of like Temple (unless you get all 4 orbs in the mid or the other team does) Seething Shore is one of the few BGs which punishes a zerg

1 Like
17

and it might triple your queue time too, especially during off hours

play alliance isnt a good solution either, i do have alliance characters and sometimes i want to play horde

18

When SS pops, i instantly leave…i do the same thing when WG pops…i dont feel bad about it either.

5 Likes
19

Tabbed out just to upvote this :+1:

20

Seething Shore before Silvershard Mines. Any time, anywhere, any day.

1 Like