How is pointing out that your views are literal Fox News talking points a strawman? What you say is what they promote. I have heard several of their talking heads refer to well known figures in Hollywood and the government as “priests” of liberalism or progressivism.
You can go ahead and believe I somehow constructed a strawman of your position and use that as a reason to not take me seriously. I also have no interest in continuing any more discussions with rabid zealots.
What about the non-rabid kind? Like where’s your line on this zealotry, let’s compromise.
All I heard was “Church bad” some more.
Shrug
All I keep hearing is reasons why you get sat between grandma-ma and the newest baby cousin who’s big enough to sit up in a high chair at family gatherings. So I guess we’re even.
At least I didn’t have to write several sentences to say one thing. =p
That is one sentence, followed by pointing out we’re even.
Well, that conversation is over thankfully. Hopefully some actual smart people come in here and say something on the topic.
Like the ones who can identify single sentences. Yeah. I’m up for setting the bar that high too.
everybody’s got their extremists. Look at those climate crazies gluing themselves to stuff
Ehhh… I doubt there’s actual extremism here. Sometimes deep seated self esteem issues masquerade as such. The conversation aim of one participant was tailored at trying hard to invalidate and insult others with the bland bubblegum topics that everyone’s chewed to death. If Harley really truely desired a battleground about political views, I gave them a massive gateway in by asking their opinion about the Synod on Synodality the Catholic Church just wrapped up. It was a fiasco, it’s legitimacy is still being contested. The Pope’s authority and validity came under fire. His very first declaration of the Synod was that political views were not to be entertained for any basis of discussion. That lit a fire instantaneously.
But, given Harley didn’t take that opportunity, it’s clear they neither care about the politics or the Church they’re so eager to defend. They just wanted to make an attempt to invalidate and insult, which is fine. Everyone needs a hobby.
Gluing oneself to things has gotten less extreme. They choose paintings now over concrete when those couple of protestors had to have amputations. The concrete and epoxy was way more effective than they had anticipated. Some folks forget that stuff is strong enough to hold airplanes together for years. Big woops.
So much trolling in this thread
Bring me back my teary eyed Brad Pitt failadin I don’t know this dude
What a fantastic break down of the cinematic and coming from someone who has no idea what’s going on. Hasn’t played since the original Warcraft.
The wide nervous-looking anxious crazed expression of this man’s face to the right surely convinces me to watch his analysis.
When did they give Anduin a hood?
wow almost a month and the thread is still going.
Impressive.
Why? Because he’s not a sweaty gladiator?
Oh, it’s this bad agenda. Nevermind.
You musta missed OP coming back to the forums last week and saying Anduin was supa-masculine after the Fyrakk kill video came out.
LOL. He said Anduin was just fine, the cinematic great in comparison to family frienship magic at the end of the raid cutscene.
Edit: looks like that thread got deleted unfortunately. It was pretty entertaining.
They can still fix Anduin. What they need to do with him is change his attitude, stop with the emo stuff and give him a SUPER HOT wife. The alliance deserves a gigachad leader.