Blizzard can do whatever they want with their servers.
1 Like
I was specifically addressing your point that, “rare” spawns should be, “rare”.
Correct. And they can bleed subs like they always do in retail by doing whatever they want.
1 Like
Course they can, did you see how much Activision stock went up today? They’re doing just fine
Uh huh. Because Classic isn’t what at least doubled their subscriptions, and is paying for live development now.
Only Blizzard has access to that data. Regardless, I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. My point is, Blizzard has the internal data, clearly this change hasn’t affected them all that much since their company seems to be doing well financially.
I’m not sure either of us are qualified to give a multi-million dollar company advice anyways.
1 Like
what does this even mean lol
Correct, and Blizzard mentioned it in their financial report after Classic’s launch.
Also this change just happened. It’s far, far too soon to have an impact. Plus this isn’t going to make that big of an impact to Blizzard financially. That’s not a good reason for doing it though.
This “misadventure” character doesn’t like, and will continue to push that narrative.
If it won’t affect them financially, then it sounds like they won’t be bleeding subs like you predicted. I have to go to bed now, have a lovely night Esimpure.
Keep giving yourself a pat on the back for managing to ban 74k in a month when NetEase banned 120k this week and 100k last week. I’m not comparing you to ESO or Runescape as those are different games. I’m not comparing you to private servers created and ran by people who love the game and were able to do instant bans. I’m comparing you to a company that is just licensed to run the same game in another country NetEase. They did not make the game and yet they can provide better support than you.
1 Like
Rolled the wrong faction if you were looking for lots of good open world PvP.
Being on Heartseeker makes no difference.
this is a welcome post.
Remove the instance cap…
Thanks for the update 
So multiboxers that use third party input splicing are banned? 'cause if not you’re only partially addressing the problem.
3 Likes
The lack of silly arbitrary daily limits are the reason I love classic and not retail… PLEASE, get rid of it. You’re ruining my one day a week that I get to play wow.
1 Like
This one change, no. If they keep doing these things, yes.
Blizzard will just classify multiboxers as, “legitimate players”. In that sense, it’s not fair that mulitboxers are, “legitimate players” but people selling boosts or farming instances are not.
So you’re fine with your dps being mediocre? If you don’t need charges for every boss you better be running alts through them! At this point your dps should be riding your behind on the threat meter! You’re ignorant!
Oh, and you forgot if feral dps want the charges too! A feral dps that has cleared BWL not using MCPs is getting carried. Warriors and rogues do a very significant amount more dps than a non-MCP using feral. I can understand not using in MC/Ony/ZG, but not having one for every boss in BWL? Lazy druid is lazy.
“rare” is a false idea in WoW. Look at Thunderfury! It’s a legendary and there are guilds with multiple. The rare argument by that person is silly.