Well, that is one reason it must remain legal. If you take away the option entirely, then they would not have the choice - being further victimized by being forced to carry a child to term that was forced on them.
Would you agree with at least allowing abortion to be legal in those cases?
Those are hardly acceptable alternatives at all if they force a woman to bring a pregnancy to full term.
If a woman finds out she is pregnant, and doesn’t want to carry the child, she should be able to choose what happens to her body. Especially in the first trimester. Full stop.
That depends. As I said earlier, there should always be exceptions, like fetal inviability or the health of the mother. So I would not ban them out right.
I laid out my thoughts earlier, they align largely with Roe v Wade. 1st trimester should be allowed on demand, but restrictions in the second and third.
Oh, tons. I used to write for my school paper in high school and college, and I was involved in debate teams. I spoke with quite a few nascent Tucker Carlson’s in my day.
Your position isn’t unique. There are many anti abortionists about. It is a hotly debated topic and both sides have many ardent supporters.
I don’t see why that is even a question you would ask me… Parents of adopted children usually tell me, or it is very plain. I can’t even imagine running around asking people that - that seems quite personal and rude. “Hey is that your real kid?” Um… I would likely let them tell me, if they chose to, without asking.
I disagree with them.
I think they are speaking from a place of security, safety, and disregard for the experiences of others. They tend to be older, religious, and Southern. Since they are likely older, it isn’t even an concern for them. Anti abortionists tend to be older.
I think if those women don’t like abortion, they do not have to have one. They should not be involved in other women’s choices.