PVE is best I think for East. But there should be 1 PVP and one PVE
1 pvp and 1 pve per region, no boosts, no transfers for 6 months. Iâm East and would only play on a pvp server.
3 Likes
maybe ever?
I AGREE with this 100%
The Elite raiders i knew at the time were consistently broke, thatâs why they were elite. Dumping thier gold on consumables
I believe that! Unfortunately, I only have the deep dark internet to reference old Vanilla forum discussions.
Nothing is stopping you from deleting all your old toons and gold and starting from scratch
Again you can roll on a new server, nothing is prventing you from doing this
See point 1
Which begs the question is that eventually everyone will get to 70 and go through, but you complain about layers but donât think of the infrastructure and administrative costs of entire new servers to serve s minuscule portion of the gamer base for whatâŚa couple weeks?
Which only seem to be what you want, what about others dont want even more reason to make the game more inefficient.
Thatâs a terrible motivator. It doesnât work in real life and it doesnât work in video games.
No, existing communities are not new.
Itâs not a rush if the only people doing it are those rolling belfs or draenei. On a fresh TBC server, thereâd be 10x the number so 10x the rush.
How can you even say that after reading every point and replying to half of them, lol? Try harder.
4 Likes
When Blizzard used to release new realms, such as with the original launch of The Burning Crusade, and also more new realms shortly after launch, they specifically stated that these servers were for those that wanted a fresh start and to begin a new adventure.
This is exactly what we are asking for, and no other reason or validation needs to be given.
We want to start a new adventure, a fresh start, from level 1, with no boosts or transfers, and have the opportunity to enjoy the game from that starting point. This will mean making new friends, forming new guilds, etc.
It can all just be summed up as simply as Blizzard themselves put it when they would make a forum post announcing these new original TBC realms: For those looking to start a new adventure.
These realms could only be started from level 1 and was not a transfer destination. Realms that were created specifically for being a transfer destination were stated as such.
It is completely irrelevant and pointless to try to pick out any holes with wanting that new adventure, or making a list of reasons why you donât think its needed.
We want that new adventure in TBC, because TBC is a far improved version of Classic WoW and will be a great experience for all classes.
We want to start a new adventure, thatâs all that needs to be said.
11 Likes
Oceanic needs another pvp server minimum. Both the existing servers have high enough level 60 pops that Outland will be unplayable without extensive layering
1 Like
hello we need fresh server ty have good day
7 Likes
Well if they want my money there better be fresh servers for all of the reasons listed here, otherwise forget It.
10 Likes
Me personally I doubt Iâll play these normal progression servers.
58 boosts? wtf is going on
They might as well add player name changes, faction changes, wow tokens, wow mounts, free war glaives.
5 Likes
Bad decisions is whatâs going on.
I can understand them claiming itâs for people to âcatch upâ to their friends and play in Outland, but thatâs NOT the only thing that TBC is about.
TBC is just a BETTER World of Warcraft.
A BETTER experience from level 1 and all the way to 70.
Itâs more fun to play all classes, all dungeon loot is improved. Thereâs more quests. A better experience period.
So making the claim that Outland is all that matters for TBC is just incorrect.
58 boost is a slap in the face to the philosophy of playing Classic WoW.
I highly doubt they are going to take it away, but I pray we get Fresh Start servers that donât allow boosts or transfers. That way we can play TBC properly and not the absolute trash heap its going to be for all other servers.
8 Likes
Seems like there was a pretty sizeable launch for a PServer over the weekend, getting some good numbers for TBC. Overall they were more populated than many of the servers currently on the list which is a good sign to blizzard for the interest in fresh servers.
1 Like
EU Has gotten over 1300 and Possibly over 3k. NA has roughly over 1K and growing rapidly during the day. During peak hours on Sunday we were getting 1-4 people joining a minute. We are putting together a Horde Guild on NA called Phoenix. Come check us out on the discord. Lets make a number 1 Raid Team!
Le bump /10
1 Like
This was the inevitable conclusion that one arrives at with he OPâs suggestion
Communities never stay the same, even in classic onward people come and go. The âcommunityâ argument always failed because it was always a totally subjective measurement.
Again there is no need for fresh server since people can and will re-roll with new toons constantly, ergo again.
I say it because it is true. to give into he âfreshâ brigade would mean that Blizzard would be constantly adding new 'fresh serves for a smaller and smaller population of the people playing. More servers, more people, more cost.
Itâs bad enough that we pay what we do for this game but adding overhead for a minuscule portion of the player base who wantâ freshâ servers when everything they want can be found on the couple âclassic eraâ servers they are making or going onto TBC.
Fresh servers are a bad idea because they add nothing but cost for experiences which can already be found in the game
Just voicing my approval for fresh TBC servers, never allowing boosts/transfers.
Iâm in the camp of someone who has played classic since the beginning, currently in Naxx, and would rather start fresh than inherit current servers only for TBC
15 Likes
In a Fresh server those mage wonât be able to do aoe grind, so bot will have more difficulty to be âgoodâ we will see them and reported them faster. Fresh server is the key to a long term
1 Like