9.1 is almost out

Remember when Jaina was going to drown Ogrimmar in Water Elementals but got talked out of it by her then-Dragon BF?

3 Likes

brb vomiting

2 Likes

The biggest problem about criticizing someone’s favorite games (and characters in those games) tend to, for some reason, translate like you’re attacking a person’s personality rather than criticizing the game since clearly if the game is bad so is their choices of personal enjoyment.

Which is obviously not the case, but people are emotional creatures.

This has just been exasperated over the months as WoW becomes more and more under fire for under-performing on a game level, and on a company level as ActiBlizzard continues to drop the ball.

7 Likes

People literally make their entire personalities out of their favourite (garbage) hobbies so roundabout it turns out you are personally attacking them, it’s because they have literally nothing else

now ask me how Blizzard used this to catapult themselves to multimillion subscriber success

trick question. don’t

7 Likes

I would LOVe to see actual canonical aggression from both sides, it always seems to me like in BFA for example the aggressor has been “POV”.

The alliance see the horde aggression through the alliance lens, and the Horde see the Alliance aggression through the Horde lens and that gives the story continuity errors.

I want to see the dark and the light of it no matter which side I’m on.

My Warrior, RP’d the War of Thorns as the “dark” moment, to the point where she was forced to retire because she refused the unlawful order to help burn the tree.

With my Rogue, in her backstory, when it reached the chapter where she killed a priestess simply to escape, I wrote it as a dark panicky moment in her history that she has since buried as her deepest secret (it was cold blooded murder, and its easy to get away with cold blooded murder, just don’t talk about it, she would say, and then she went to Pandaria and became a mistweaver and fought against Garrosh’s forces)

We saw the story of Thanos as obviously DARK and EVIL, and knowing what he did was wrong, but we still understood and sympathized with his emotions for doing what he did while simultaneously hating him for it, because they wrote it correctly.

Blizzard needs to write both sides of the story the same, if the Alliance does something evil, word it as being evil for the alliance players who read it, if the horde does something evil, word it as them doing something evil so you can connect with what you’re playing while knowing hey this is the bad choice part of the story.

A lot of BFA was written with the faction you were on ALWAYS in the right, when it should be written for what it is, no matter the faction you are playing, Horde attacking that town in tiragarde should be horde attacking that town in tiragarde and not mahically morphing into…a defensive action…? when you get the true motivation when you play the same quest series on Alliance.

Stop the point of view storytelling and let us know we are in the middle of a bad deed and stuck between a rock and a hard place.

You see Negan do objectively bad things, yet people still LOVE him (i mean I mainly like him cause Jeffrey Dean Morgan hot AF but that is beside the point) You have to love to hate a villain, or you won’t even hate the villain because, it’s replaced by pure apthy for said villain, cause they have no purpose. Which is where I thinkj Sylvanas and the jailer went wrong, even with some of my leanings towards, okay maybe this new plot isn’t THAT bad in the end.

Anyway I could write all day about how I feel Blizzard doesn’t do their villains justice, but thats for another day. More Thanos, less Jailer.

2 Likes

i get that, but i think people who get defensive or who feel the need to lash out over their favorite franchise getting criticized (rightly or wrongly) should probably re-examine their relationship to the media they consume

i also have deep attachments to specific bits of media that are near and dear to my heart and that buoyed me through some very dark times, and seeing said media be criticized or even mocked has never made me feel the need to take up sword and shield

no?? not in the slightest

also more mcu is exactly what wow doesn’t need right now imho

1 Like

i don’t know if this holds. i’m perfectly fine with people criticising some of my favourite games. i think it’s just there’s a lot of sylvanas fans who have made “SYLVANAS FAN” a part of their core identity

5 Likes

That’s why I think it helps to think of all WoW characters as B-characters.

You’re not gonna get shakespeare, and you’re not going to get Mass Effect level storytelling from World of Warcraft, it’s going to be quirky, it’s going to be corny, and it’s going to be cheesy.

But Blizzard is trying to make their game super serious. Akin to the Stargate series going from quirky in joke universe to SUPER DRAMATIC BATTLESTAR GALACTICA STYLE Stargate Universe.

It doesn’t FIT, and but it’s fun to talk about them as if they’re serious characters, for me anyway lol.

Yes but it doesn’t have to be outright insultingly terrible. There’s probably a hard line between “quirky and corny” and “why don’t we very badly portray actual genocide as a rule of cool moment???”

Remember supporting his motives is not tacit support of his actions.

That’s what makes a good villain, they BELIEVE they are in the right, even when the yare very very wrong.

You SEE Thanos being genuine, and truth in his eyes, you see sadness when he kills his own daughter, but you can still condemn him for his overtly terrible acts.

“Write a villain your reader’s love to hate, or your readers will simply hate your storytelling.”

2 Likes

Thank you. I thought “we” was an extremely strong word for it; I honestly thought it was a load of hot garbage and actually made it hard for me to stay invested in the story at all.

Oh you’re absolutely right, that’s exactly what i’m saying, BFA, Shadowlands, it’s Blizzard trying to make a masterpiece out of what ISN’T a masterpiece. They should keep their characters silly and fun, not dramatic.

It’s basically if they put Mickey Mouse in Die Hard. It doesn’t work.

1 Like

no???

i was too busy being baffled at how utterly stupid and ill-thought-out his whole ~master plan~ was

nothing about him was sympathetic, or understandable, or even sensical

why kill a bunch of people (and animals, and plants for some reason) in response to a supposed resource crisis that we see no evidence of but are assured totally exists when he could have snapped more resources into existence??

instead of creating material abundance he acts like an edgy teenager who’s just discovered eco-fascism

honestly he was cooler and more fun when he was just horny for Ms. Sexy Lady Death

4 Likes

Agreed wholeheartedly, but much of that is Blizzard’s fault. I’m not sure any other race has such a singular entity that defines it, as she has always defined The Forsaken of Lordaeron. She is that, because they designed her that way.

I’m trying to figure out the best way to explain what I’m thinking, but my brain is short-circuiting at the moment.

Everything about her is exactly what they wanted her to be. It’s marketing. Even just from a superficial standpoint and how she looks - she’s dead. She should be rotting and falling apart. Instead, Blizzard has spent years making her the WoW version of that Jessica Rabbit line, “I’m not bad, I’m just drawn that way.” The fans bought it. They wanted it and Blizzard kept feeding it to them.

Blizzard made her. Blizzard is trashing her. For all the laughs I’ve been having at this, it’s really a sad ending for what could have been a grand character in a grand story.

6 Likes

Compelling stories just need to be internally consistent. Quality of the writing is kind of secondary.

There are still Empire vs Stormcloak debates 10 years later because Bethesda wrote the factions in a consistent manner.

Alliance vs Horde isnt even a discussion any more. One’s about as thrilling as the UN General Assembly and the other is Saudi Arabia’s seat on the UN’s council for women’s rights.

2 Likes

Exactly! Tha’s why you love to hate him!

The way to fix his dilemna is RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIM but he doesn’t see it. He instead, is a cross between having a genuine motivation, mixed with some egomania, understanding his motivation is not tacit support of his actions.

Thanos went COMPLETELY the wrong direction, he could have been hailed as a hero to the universe, he had godlike power, but whether he was hurt by his own loss, and his own suffering or whatever, it caused him to not think about anything but suffering. To the point where he was willing to kill his own daughter to achieve his goals.

And in the end, karma got him back, when HE got snapped instead. And i remember, almost feeling bad for him in that final scene when he sat down, dejected, failed, and turning to dust (but only for a moment because then Iron Man made me cry even more)

Also: Skyrim belongs to the Nords.

i don’t hate him though

my feelings about him could be summed up as a mix of “meh” and “but why”

1 Like

It’s godmoding to tell people how they feel, yo

(I will say, mostly jokingly, I love the thanos snap because Thanos was the only being powerful enough to stop Samuel L. Jackson from swearing, battle of the titans right there.)

Anyway, and the meh is kinda how i am about the Jailer, because we know next to nothing about him.

“Big bad guy kill everything”

I don’t CARE about the Jailer, I don’t care to beat him I kinda, meh.

“You love to hate him” is meant as a general phrase, not AT anyone or anything.