Every gd thread needs to be responded to within 15s of creation and ion, danuser, and Bobby kotick, need to all personally go to ops house crying and begging op for forgiveness. Anything less is a slap in the face.
6 Likes
yes, before my time. So that didn't work out?
No i think they took it down so that there would be no quarrel over idea “ownership”.
Which is funny as anything you do on their servers/websites, up to and including even just a piece of art or a book idea, if posted here is no longer your personal property.
1 Like
You realize most companies have figured out that you can hire people to talk to customers that aren’t actually making the product. It’s really quite common.
20 Likes
Such engagement.
Much wow
1 Like
Regardless of what you think of the topic the quality of the post was low.
What are Hallmark Movies?
If they were actually doing anything then we would not need a council. 
8 Likes
Are you sure? All they seem to do is strike.
7 Likes
Mayhap you should go and educate yourself on why that is.
What an uninformed comment.
2 Likes
I’m plenty educated on the circumstances, and I came to a different conclusion than you.
6 Likes
That’s not what the CC forums are about though.
The CC forums are a direct line between the players and the developers, and we’ve seen that, several of the blue posts on the CC forums are not from community managers but the developers themselves.
If Blizzard was going to just have community managers make all the blue posts, then they may as well have never created the CC forums. Because the point of them would be absolutely moot.
Shouldn’t be so limited or exclusive, though.
At least give the uninvited the ability to cast: “ye” or “ne”."
Maybe if Blizz added some “incentives,” the devs would engage more.
For example, they could make their holiday/end of year bonuses partially based on redeeming a token, each of which has a 10% chance to up their bonus by $500. And they get a token for every post they put in the CC forum. But they are limited to only two posts per week.
I don’t know, maybe I’m just a crazy cow, but for some reason, that type of approach seems to make sense to my little cow brain.
/moo 
1 Like
Sorry but no.
Because at that point you create a massive can of worms. Imagine for example, that Blizzard puts up a yae or nay option for the inclusion of a roleplaying system. They can’t limit the voting to people on roleplaying realms only, and there are far more non-roleplayers than there are roleplayers.
If all the non-roleplayers and trolls decide “Nah, we don’t think Blizzard should be wasting time on giving the roleplayers what they want, we want them focusing on what WE want.” then the ‘nay’ votes would win every single time and roleplayers wouldn’t get anything.
And same goes for other things like PvP, world content, class changes etc. Those who don’t like PvP/World content have an incentive to vote no so Blizzard focuses on what they want, and if you think a class is fine, or you don’t want a class to improve because doing so would put your class in a weaker position, you’re incentivized to hit the no button so class changes don’t happen either.
A closed system of 100 people is fine.
1 Like
A closed system of 100 people only represents 100 people opinion not everyone else.
A thumbs up or thumbs down should be there
4 Likes
Have you read General Discussion?
1 Like
Again, no, because you’d have the problem I demonstrated above.
Game design isn’t a democracy, it’s a dictatorship. Game design by committee would be an absolute nightmare for everyone involved.
again it’s no, you don’t know how people would vote. What you are saying is your own opinion stop making it look like it’s everyone else’s. a voting system gives everyone a voice.
2 Likes
A lot of people on holiday right now. I’ll wait until January to make a judgement. CC members can post in their own time but actual employees are likely going to do it during work time.