5 weeks of 100% winrate not enough?

Who still talks like this? :roll_eyes:

Retail demonhunters. :wink:

1 Like

Ooooh. I hear that class takes a lot of skill.

What’s funny is, even WHEN Alliance had premades, Horde would still get it’s share of bonus honor. Sometimes up to 4k worth.

Alliance has at least 2 out of 5 games with ZERO bonus honor, and most of the time it’s less than 1k.

So with premades it was Alliance winning around 60% of the time (don’t forget all the AV’s horde won when premades weren’t in that AV) and Horde still getting some bonus honor, while now it’s Horde dominating 95% of time and Alliance getting zippo. Sounds fair.

1 Like

Localization? Pretty simple answer. Do you mean to tell me you’ve never seen players on NA servers with names and pet names in Asian characters? Same thing applies.

The player who posted that in our Discord resides in the US, but plays on both NA and Taiwanese servers.

伊弗斯 may well be a PvE server as you said earlier. I don’t know. But in what bearing does that have on anything at the end of the day? PvE servers aren’t separate from others in the BG pool.

Yeah still not buying it. 伊弗斯 doesn’t translate to Maraudon (and I know you said you weren’t clear on this) but there’s just no other information except a sketchy looking screen shot.

LOL level 18 forum trolls are sad

Getting around the game preventing you from forming a premade group for AV sounds exactly like an exploit which is why Blizzard has taken action to prevent it. It’s very fair. Sorry your faction doesn’t want to actually try to win on even ground.

I brought that up in the past and the response I got equated to “Yeah, but it is hard to complete the cap because horde can attack it from all angles”.

https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/character/tw/%E4%BC%8A%E5%BC%97%E6%96%AF/supreme#
This is literally his WCL profile. That’s where I pulled server name from. Clearly indicates TW, don’t know what else you’re looking for to be honest.

Answer me this:
Is 25% of a 40 person team AFKing/Leeching “bad”?
Is a faction that attracts those who prefer to not PVP in relation to playing a BG “bad”?

Perhaps in asia there are no loiterers, and neither faction is filled with those who dislike PVP.

You’re asking a question based on speculation with statistics that have no foundation. Do you expect an honest answer?

Really? That’s your response?

edit: OK, I’ll humor you. Remove the latter “speculation” and limit it to
Is 25% of a 40 person team AFKing/Leeching “bad”?

If you want to claim that 25% of alliance teams regularly being AFK/Leeching has no foundation, I am not going to waste any more time on you.

Why dont you have a 100% win rate in wsg with all the premades you have?

2 Likes

I’m already done with you so it works out for both of us.

How convenient that you cannot even acknowledge the regular occurrence of 25% of the alliance teams being AFKing/Leeching.

I play horde on skeram and in the last two weeks I’m about 80% on probably 15 AVs so it’s definitely not 100%.

That being said, it’s pretty ignorant to act surprised about this. the nature of Classic wow before it even dropped was that… in terms of AV… horde would be more populated more active in PvP and tend to win anything that’s not a zerg. That is relatively common in retail even. Now, 80% win rate for a faction is definitely drastic but the ultimate point to be made here is simple…

Blizzard deserves a ton of a recognition for being consistent and doing there best not to alter the original experience that we wanted, whatever obstacles that brings… AV being unbalanced is really just blizzard doing there best to edit the que system without changing it completely… they know that this means hr and half que times for horde and a rough experience for Ally trying to earn rewards through AV but as a community… that’s what we asked for didn’t we?

Once they make the BIG changes in classic, it won’t ever end and the Original experience is then automatically hindered. The reason blizzard isnt going into classic and adjusting the system is because of us… as frustrating as some of the community is about some of the set backs of that I think we all can agree that Blizzard holding there ground is really something we should be thankful for in the long run. Again, that’s what we asked for.

Have you done any sleuthing based off that WCL profile? Does that line up?

I’m genuinely curious myself.

His parses looked weird being greys/greens, but the lack of previous raids prior to Feb 22nd actually lines up, considering he just finished grinding Rank 14 recently on his NA toon:
https://classic.warcraftlogs.com/character/us/stalagg/supremacy

It looks like he just rolled a new character after finishing up HWL on NA.

Nah. At the absolute worst, we have 3 or 4 afks.

The problem is horde cave spawns right next to ibgy and sfgy is indefensible due to horde spawn placement.

You want so desperately for this to be a matter of skill when it isn’t.

Pug vs pug wsg games entirely shut this argument down.

You guys have a blatant advantage and are arguing to keep it. That is all this entire thing boils down to.

1 Like

Im sorry, are we just going to completely going to ignore the fact that Alliance are winning in Asia on the same map? Clearly it doesn’t just “boil down” to map.

They’re playing on the same damned map you are. You’re claiming we’re making it all about skill, while you’re here inversely trying so desperately to make it all about map.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/640810811245330442/681972300274204739/unknown.png

These things aren’t mutually exclusive principals. It can be a little of column A, a little of column B.

1 Like

And potentially column C the return of OCE premades, which would only be consistent with the history of NA AV as well.