Again - If it’s fine - Let it be,and global update will arrive when it ready
It’s fine but could be better and should be released in a better state.
Why not let it be released in this way,and then,when they’re done - release updated campaings and higher settings?
1 Like
A lot of post-launch support for a remaster/remake/whatever we want to dub it seems unlikely unless it’s profitable and marketable.
A game license would be more appealing to consumers (and subsequently, shareholders) if the content was a lot stronger.
8 Likes
It’s not 00s,man. Unfinished project is not running out of time,Games aren’t using CD’s anymore - Game can be supported for YEARS! Adding more and more stuff every update,fixing bugs every few weeks
1 Like
Games that are in early access or an equivalent state for too long are just as bad as games that don’t spend long enough in the oven.
2 Likes
Also - Delay means that a lot of good content can be scrapped- For exsample,a badass Illidan vs Arthas fight can turn into…A Cinematic…God,why?..
And Campaing screens can turn into cringey 3D instead of epic 2D
A delay could also mean re-integrating content from the previous incarnation of the game such as ladder on release (rather than patched in) and Reign of Chaos online play.
1 Like
Which means more stuff for Multiplayer and less for Campaing…
I don’t think game development is as linear as you think it is. Pipelines exist but I’m sure the typical model is more of a bell curve where it’s very focused at the beginning and then very focused at the end.
If scrapping good things means waiting longer to get some stupid Multiplayer - Then it’s terrible
You have talked with me in at least… two? Other threads about this.
There is more that could be developed than multiplayer elements.
Again - Illidan vs Arthas?
Could be the tip of the iceberg and they could reintroduce hand animated in-game cutscenes rather than the more machinima style cutscenes.
To get a lot of hater from majority of players? Such as pros and purists?
It’s hard to engage in a conversation with you when you’re just such a huge defeatist.
Blizzard doesn’t use every piece of feedback no matter how vehement some might be.
They uses most profitable ones
If Blizzard’s only listening to pros and purists like you think they are, you’d think for the competitive play they’d have ladder on launch and not patched in after.
4 Likes
Another years of mute development? Another higher ruined expectations?
If Blizzard’s only listening to pros and purists like you think they are, you’d think they’d have scrapped any campaign changes entirely rather than just scaling back the amount of changes.