Because their money is worth the same amount as the money from the people who are not hateful and/or non-constructive.
A year ago they already listened their targeting audience of hateful and/or non-constructive players who said that Demo sucked. Why should they now listen same hateful and/or non-constructive people,if they already did,and it was a bad choice?
Only polite and constructive opinions deserve atention
Do you still think they heard it? You donât realize that they used it as an excuse because they didnât arrive.
Proofs? Game has been in development for a while and they sure had time if not them
and even then there is no personalized campaign. something that was already before.
And this is a constructive criticism.
What is a personalized campaign?
With the word Editor you can make your own campaigns.
but they didnât put the option to play them.
This is not how business works. A business cares about profit, in other words getting the most customers as possible. Perceived goodwill works towards gaining and keeping customers. "F"ing up by doing controversial things, making promises you donât keep and releasing subpar products reduces goodwill which in turn reduces customers and profit.
Again, the politeness and constructiveness of the comments made by the customers is not relevant. They are airing their opinion and it is the companies duty to please the customer, not the other way around.
Excuse me but this is stupid.
The point of criticism is to grow up and make things better. If there is no corrections, there canât be improvement.
The problem here is that Blizzard donât want to make good and innovate games anymore, they want to make money, and only money. This mentality leads them inevitably to death because there is no more passion in their products.
Also, Iâm not sure that people here love W3:R. We all love Classic W3, not Reforged.
The only problem is from Blizzard, not from its community.
Dead? wtf are you on about, the game is pretty active considering that it was more than a decade old.
Heck even diablo 2 is still alive and well averaging around 15k active players online.
Blizzard is a multi billionaire company, stop defending them like there were babies.
They knew they would receive this backslash for releasing this joke and they did it.
Well first of all because its not that they are hateful and non constructive.
They are pasionate, and you among others first need to know the difference between a constructive criticism from liking everything thatâs tossed infront of you blindly, or worrying about details that are minor and while should be worked on, they are not a priority.
Wanna know which game didnât do so? Heroes of the Storm, howâs that game now?
SO if I run a restaurant, I can defecate on your plate and serve you that as a main course, but you will give me a good review in hopes for things to change right?
Ok here is my positive feedback.
Redo Reforged and copy Warcraft 3 (menus, chats, skins, animations, etc) but with small upgrades here and there. Like more polygons on models, better physics, smoother shadows, more animations, etc. And bring it to battle.net 2.
Here is my double down on positive feedback that would have even saved money to blizzard.
Reforged was not actually needed, just deliver a new bigger patch wiht optimisations and all that jazz, and move the old WC3 to the new launchers and give them the support of the new servers.
People really underestimate how having a game in the front of your store does affect its popularity, specially a game with a lot of history like Warcraft 3.
I will write a bad feedback but instead of blindly hate this place I will said what the problem - negative,but constructive
Blizzard did not perfect,but suprisingly good job with Reforged,all thatâs left is point out something they should re do
So if you saw someone tell someone, âHey buddy Iâm your best friend, Iâm going to take the best care of you ever.â
But then turned around and shoot them in the face with a 12 gauge shotgun.
Are you going to run around and try to convince everyone that itâs not their fault, that people need to stop being so critical of them, so that hopefully, if they decide to, they can un-shoot that person in the face with a 12 gauge shotgun?
I fail to see how your apologist pacifist approach does anything productive.
Do you think slave masters were inclined to change their ways if all the slaves sat around like "Yes Massa, Itâs real nice here in this re-purposed pig sty with hay on the ground for us to call living quarters. Real nice Massa! Five Stars Massa!
Nah dude. Thatâs not how you affect greedy, in-compassionate, self-centered people. You affect those people where it hurts. By trashing their product, trashing their decisions, trashing their abilities to understand what the market expects and what the market will allow you to get away with.
You trash them, you refund, you charge back credit cards. You give them nothing.
Itâs their OWN fault if they lose money on this debacle. If they would have invested MORE money to deliver what they PROMISED, they would have been able to SELL MORE and make MORE PROFIT.
Instead, they bait and switched, promised us the world, an actual game, they gave us this perception that we were getting much more than just a re-skin of existing models. They touted at blizzcon and in interviews that they were basically making a new game, including new missions, new heroes. They set THEMSELVES up for this.
For whatever reason people want to jump on Blizzardâs defense for all their actions, just know that you are what people in the slave industry call an uncle tom.
You are also greedy, self centered and have an agenda. You think by siding with Blizzard you will get some sort of special recognition or reward. Like they are going to give your WC3 troops all a +10 base damage modifier for being so blindly loyal?
You throw all your brethren and kin under the bus so you can sleep in the big house while the rest of your brothers protest living in the place where they let the pigs poop.
Real nice position you chose there Benedict Arnold. Real nice. Family must be so proud of you for devoting your life to such a noble cause.
Relying on updates to fix a project sold as complete/finished is absurd. That should never be the accepted standard. That is how it becomes normalized and can take years to even get all the updates or abandoned entirely after they have taken consumerâs money.
They not only discussed a potential future for this game, they showed it to us. And a lot of these goals/supposed updates are not there, are completely broken, or missing entirely.
This is, at best, late cycle Early Access status for a remastered game, advertised and sold as a finished product. But itâs clearly not finished, even by your own admission of needing to wait for updates to fix it.
A new audience will not play low-poly and not Lore-correct game,no matter how good it is
I tried recommend WC3 to a lot of my friends and always ended up with âMeh,it looks bad and I donât get the storyâ
And most of friends I recommended this liked the HL 1,Surious Sam or Elder Scrools Morrowind,but WC3 graphics are too much for them
Warcraft III needed a visual upgrade. Even a Starcraft 2 mod Armies of Azeroth proves it cause it had a lot of succes in community
âBlindly hate this placeâ
You entitled jerk, Iâve been part of the community that kept warcraft alive for the past decade and a half, donât you freaking dare to tell me or anyone that has been doing so, that we are âblindly hatingâ Because most of the people that are blindly defending blizzard right now, never really spent enough time in WC3 to appreciate what it did to online game. Let alone play it back on its prime when you had an ENDLESS flow of player created content that gave new life to th game.
I already gave a feedback down there, and that was my same statement since day 1, Because the reality is that I didnâ't want a graphs remaster or anything, the only thing that warcraft needed was to be placed in the new freaking launcher and get support from the new servers. THATâS. ALL