Are you serious?
Do you think it’s the same that the first video always stays above 30fps and the second video’s fps hovers between 5-10?
I’m disappointed in you
Are you serious?
Do you think it’s the same that the first video always stays above 30fps and the second video’s fps hovers between 5-10?
I’m disappointed in you
Are you serious? This isn’t even abotu the framerates in the individual videos at all. It’s about the system specs and environment details you are refusing to post, which would help people find solutions and help Blizzard fix the issues.
Making a couple videos and go “this one has good fps” and “this one sucks” helps nobody.
The information I ask for, which you refuse to provide, is what would help solve the problem, and validate your videos as accurately reflecting the situation (for you).
Everyone has different computing environments and those environmetns change over time. If you are unable to recognize this, then there is no reasoning with you.
No tech support person would be able to help you based on these videos, and no programmer or other game devleoper would be able to fix it based on these videos. You do not provide the information that anyone would need to do anything about this.
I’m even more disappointed in you, because you are ignorant of these things. It would potentially help everyone if you cooperated and provided the requested information, but since you do not, the effort you put into making the videos is useless.
This is the current situation of the game. My in-game situation is the same as the second video, with the same low frame rate (5-10fps) and latency,
If you think the second video is fake, please play LordaeronTF_0.72b and record the video for publication.
all players to confirm your fps on the map (LordaeronTF_0.72b)
https://maps.w3reforged.com/maps/categories/other/lordaeron-tf-072b-12829
The map you are playing is one thing I asked about, but there are many others. Please provide them all, as I listed previously.
In the meantime I would only be too happy to play it myself.
I know you dare not do it because your fps will be worse than it actually is, maybe only 3-5fps
I am not Crystalize, you have mistaken me. I am Chuanjianguo, and I have made it clear that my current in-game environment is the same as the second video released by Crystalize
As for whether the actual fps will be lower when you open the LordaeronTF_0.72b map now, only you know, because you cannot send it out, because you cannot achieve the state of maintaining 30fps or higher for the first video.
You still haven’t provided the requested information. I will wait patiently
Seriously, there is no point in replying if you’re not going to post the details of your computing environment.
Further: if you only get bad fps in this one map, then the problem is between the map itself and the current version of the game. You can’t just play 1 map and go “GAME HAS BAD FPS FIX PLZ”
3-5 fps? try 70
https://imgur.com/W8It375
Though this is still one of the slowest performing maps ive ever opened aside from 24 player footmen frenzy maybe.
I have created a picture for you,
https://imgur.com/a/Euw0YUQ
I don’t think you know one thing, as the number of army on the screen increases, the fps will decrease
If you do this, what awaits you will be latency and low fps. If you have as many units as in the first video, then you will not be able to play the game.
You will never achieve the same fps as the first video, maintain 30fps
Of course I know this, it’s incredibly basic. But what YOU may not know is that large amounts of triggers and custom scripts also slows the game down. Even then, not all things are equal and different kinds of actions have different effects on perofrmance. This map is incredibly complex and frankly, I have no idea how to play it.
The other important consideration here is that recent patches have specifically impacted custom games in various ways. This means that performance could vary with custom games in ways that they don’t in other modes.
That aside, I’m STILL waiting for you to post your specs for the system used in the videos
I already was getting well over that in the map you gave me. Yes, that was about the highest I achieved, and most of the time it was between 35-65. OFC this machine gets me 200-400 FPS in pretty much any other map or mode.
Wait, have you forgotten something? The first video is also playing this map (the same map), with the same trigger, everything is the same, everything is the same, except for war3 (1.3&2.0). These two videos have already explained everything, ok, Time is different.
Friend, if you are alone in the map, you can only get 35-65fps, and the actual situation will become even lower (in 4vs4 battles).
You will not be able to fight
I’ve forgotten nothing. I’m merely pointing out to you, in case you’re unaware, that maps like this are practically designed to break the game, and you really shouldn’t be using them to talk about how bad the game performs because the game was never designed with this stuff in mind in the first place.
And your two videos don’t explain anything. It’s just you playing the game and getting some number of FPS. You do not explain the operating environment or system specs, or anything else that would be useful to someone who wanted to fix your problem. It’s like the only reason you posted this flawed comparison was to complain.
And if you want to complain, that’s fine. But just complaining doesn’t help anybody.
Maybe, but maps like this got unplayable if you put them to their limits even back in the day. I wouldn’t have considered either performance example acceptable if I’m being honest with you.
But like I said, maps like this showcase the game engine at its worst. You can not expect something like this to perform well, it literally pushes every conceivable limit.
But once again, this goes back to the original problem I have with your “comparison.” You STILL have not posted the necessary information that would allow someone to actually evaluate your performance and your claims.
If you did both of these tests around the same time using an old game install, well, it doesn’t matter because you can’t play that multiplayer without a LAN anyway, so it’s not a useful comparison- it won’t help anyone who might want to play this map, and it won’t help Blizzard fix the problem either.
This map can run on War3 1.35 and always maintain 30fps,This map is playable。
But in War3 2.0, the fps dropped to 5fps,There is only one variable, and the War3 version is different between two videos。
Perhaps the game version has violated the right to play the map
on your machine, maybe. In mine, it does not. But I don’t know what your machine is, because you still, like 20 posts later, haven’t provided the details. Why is it such a big secret that you cant tell us?
You have proven that your machine cannot play
??? I’ve proven that my machine can play, and play better than yours.
You still haven’t posted your machine specs or other details. STILL waiting.
The first map clearly displays my fps
I can’t even play this map at 105fps, can you play it at 65fps?
Today’s joke
In classic mode, yes well over 100 fps.
Today’s joke
STILL waiting for those system specs
Your pic only shows that you have 71, although I don’t know if this is the lowest or highest, but I can display up to 112fps
This map can only run in classic mode,