Reality check:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/19/arts/nintendo-pokemon-lawsuit-pocketpair-palworld.html
Patent law is so absurd that people patent random things and then sue anyone who might’ve infringed their patent. They are called patent trolls. Patent trolls are such a big issue, I dedicated 2 years of my life to developing a piece of software that finds new ways of computing answers to the same problem. This allows you to do the same thing a patented algorithm does but with the added benefit of making patent trolls frown when they realize they have to pay court fees when their case is thrown out.
I’ve been wanting to reapply this software towards solving problems in physics, such as the n body problem, but I haven’t found the time. Too busy making it rain.
The brilliant thing about this software is that you can do whatever you want, and if someone sues you, and they have a legitimate claim, you just run the software, find a new algorithm, and you’re good to go. There are so many patents out there that it’s impossible to plan ahead and avoid getting sued. As long as your software is high profile enough, you are guaranteed to be sued at some point. This software allows you to deal with the problem after the fact, which is why it’s so brilliant.
This is also why I hate tests that make you guess the next number in a sequence. It will give you a sequence like “1, 6, 9, 7, 4, 10” and you’re supposed to know what number is next. What’s insane about this is all all numbers are next. You can craft an an algorithm to output that pattern and then literally any other number could come next. In fact, you could find an infinite number of algorithms for each possible outcome. It’s the definition of an unsolvable problem. How on Earth are you supposed to know which equation the authors of the test had in mind when they made the test.
A good example of this a F(x,A)=A / (abs(x - A) + 1)^1000000. As X approaches A, the value will be A. For any other value, it will be zero. Now, if you want to construct an equation to make the pattern I mentioned previously then you simply sum this function:
y = F(x, 1) + F(x, 6) + F(X, 9) … etc
You can now make the final number in the sequence be literally any number. This leads us into the nonsense that are climate change models. The reason you can never know what the next number in the sequence is is because this is data extrapolation. Without knowing the exact underlying algorithm, you are assuming you’ve correctly identified the process that produces this output. The probability of identifying the correct process is near zero, since there are an infinite number of equations that can output this pattern. For this reason, an algorithm outputting a pattern is absolutely useless UNLESS your algorithm derives the answers from first order principles, meaning the process is well understood & known to be correct. If the model doesn’t use first order principles, it’s nothing more than a glorified extrapolation algorithm which means it basically assumes it is correct. Do climate models use first order principles. Nope. They don’t. It’s impossible to simulate Earth’s oceans & atmospheres down to the atomic level, which is what is required to simulate the climate from first order principles. Because of this, we know that climate models are just really complex assumptions. If they are assumptions, then the assumptions should change & there should be disagreement in the models. Is there? You betcha:
https://i.imgur.com/Ql4tThd.png
LOL not a single model got 2024 nor 2023 right. They are just making stuff up. It’s obviously a religious process because this isn’t scientific in the least. They are writing scripture, not doing science. Instead of Moses seeing a burning bush, climate scientist Joe sees +2 degrees Celsius. They don’t understand that these systems are inherently impossible to predict on a fundamental level. Trying to predict the climate is like trying to see the future. If we could see the future, then I’d be rich because I’d correctly guess every stock trend and make a bazillion dollars. Why on Earth is this kind of religious thinking given the name of science. Nobody can see the future. If you think you can, you need meds and therapy.